CO·19: Difference between revisions
Chiara Dezi (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading= | |reading=unknown!]u : unknown![ | ||
|reading_lepontic=]{{c| | |reading_lepontic=]{{c|separator|separator2|d}}{{c|U||d}}[ | ||
|direction=ambiguous | |direction=ambiguous | ||
|letter_height_min=0 | |letter_height_min=0 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
|word_number=1 | |word_number=1 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script= | |corpus=Cisalpine Celtic | ||
|script=North Italic script | |||
|script_certainty=perh. | |||
|object=CO·19 Rondineto | |object=CO·19 Rondineto | ||
|position=unknown | |position=unknown | ||
|workmanship= | |workmanship=scratched after firing | ||
|condition= | |condition=damaged | ||
|type_inscription=unknown | |type_inscription=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|solinas=94 q | |solinas=94 q | ||
|morandi=166 | |morandi=166 | ||
|source_detail=Morandi 2004: 631 | |source_detail=Morandi 2004: 631 f. | ||
|checklevel=3 | |checklevel=3 | ||
|problem= | |problem=löschen {{w|)si|]si}}, {{w|is(|is[}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
Image in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 286, tav. XIV.36 (photo). | |||
Two lines and two round holes preserved on the fragment. {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 212, no. 36 reads, in different directions, ]'': k''[, ]'': is''[ or ]''si :''[ (with the two holes plus a possible third one above by the breaking edge), but the leftmost scratch does not make for a convincing letter (or part of one). Morandi instead reads a single upsilon (]'': u''[, cf. the drawing of Solinas, who gives no reading), but the two lines do not seem to be connected; numerous other reading options in different orientations and directions are possible (alpha, pi, lambda). Morandi notes that a separator would be an unicum in the graffiti from Como and points to a longer inscription, but it seems to me that the fragment is of a foot and there would not have been space for any other letters. More likely that the holes have a different function, and the scratches are a para-script mark. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:17, 4 December 2024
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Reading in transliteration: | ]u : [ |
| Reading in original script: | ]  [
|
|
| |
| Object: | CO·19 Rondineto (unidentifiable) |
| Position: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Script: | perh. North Italic script |
| Number of letters: | 1–2 |
| Number of words: | 1 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Workmanship: | scratched after firing |
| Condition: | damaged |
|
| |
| Archaeological culture: | Golasecca III A [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | 5th–early 4th c. BC [from object] |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | Solinas 1995: 94 q Morandi 2004: 166 |
|
| |
| Sources: | Morandi 2004: 631 f. |
Images
 Drawing of inscription CO·19 from Solinas 1995
|
 Potsherd CO·19 Rondineto with inscription CO·19 from Tibiletti Bruno 1969b
|
Commentary
Image in Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 286, tav. XIV.36 (photo).
Two lines and two round holes preserved on the fragment. Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 212, no. 36 reads, in different directions, ]: k[, ]: is[ or ]si :[ (with the two holes plus a possible third one above by the breaking edge), but the leftmost scratch does not make for a convincing letter (or part of one). Morandi instead reads a single upsilon (]: u[, cf. the drawing of Solinas, who gives no reading), but the two lines do not seem to be connected; numerous other reading options in different orientations and directions are possible (alpha, pi, lambda). Morandi notes that a separator would be an unicum in the graffiti from Como and points to a longer inscription, but it seems to me that the fragment is of a foot and there would not have been space for any other letters. More likely that the holes have a different function, and the scratches are a para-script mark.
