kiketu: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
|language=Celtic
|language=Celtic
|analysis_morphemic={{m|king-}}{{m|-et-|et-}}{{m|-ū|ū}} or {{m|kīk-}}{{m|-ed-|ed-}}{{m|-ū|ū}}
|analysis_morphemic={{m|king-}}{{m|-et-|et-}}{{m|-ū|ū}} or {{m|kīk-}}{{m|-ed-|ed-}}{{m|-ū|ū}}
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|k}}{{p|i}}({{p|n}}){{p|g}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|ū}}/ or /{{p|k}}{{p|ī}}{{p|k}}{{p|e}}{{p|d}}{{p|ū}}/
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|k}}{{p|i}}{{p|n}}{{p|g}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|ū}}/ or /{{p|k}}{{p|ī}}{{p|k}}{{p|e}}{{p|d}}{{p|ū}}/
|meaning='Kiketu'
|meaning='Kiketu'
|field_semantic=personal name
|field_semantic=personal name
|checklevel=2
|checklevel=2
|problem=commentary
|problem={{bib|Schrijver 1995}}: 71, patronymic -ed-? Morphemseite kik-?
}}
}}
==Commentary==
==Commentary==
1) ''cīco-'' "flesh", cf. ''CICEDV''; 2) ''cingo-'' "walk", cf. ''Cingetius'', ''Cingetorix'' (> "warrior") (cf. {{bib|Markey & Mees 2003}}: 140, {{bib|Villar & Prósper 2005}}: 286, {{bib|RIG}}: M-106, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978-9}}: 258-259, fn. 25, {{bib|CIL}}: XIII 3707, {{bib|KGP}}: 171, {{bib|GPN}}: 73-74, 177-179, {{bib|DLG}}: 116, {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 64, 65, 216, {{bib|Matasović 2009}}: 200, 204?, {{bib|McCone 1996}}: 55, {{bib|Schrijver 1995}}: 71, {{bib|Stüber 1998}}: 25, {{bib|Stüber 2005}}: 95, {{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 1999}}: 156, {{bib|IEW}}: 439, {{bib|CCCG}}: 175, {{bib|VKG}}: 37, II 2, II 101); ''-ēto-''/''-ēdo-'', cf. ''Cicetius'', {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978-9}}: 258 (and other comparisons), {{bib|CIL}}: XIII 2836), cognomen? (cp. {{bib|Markey & Mees 2003}}: 140, {{w||plialeθu}}, {{w||seχeθu}}, {{w||oletu}})
Probably an ''on''-stem personal name in the nominative, though a patronym formed with individualising {{m||}} or {{m||-ed-}} can maybe not be entirely excluded (see the inscription page).
 
Though the attested form is orthographically ambiguous, the most straight-forward analysis of the name is a hypocorism of a name in {{m||king-|king}}{{m||-et-}} 'attacker, warrior, footsoldier' as in, e.g., {{bib|CIL}} XIII 3707 {{tr|lat|cingetius}}, Caesar BG V.22.I ''cingetorix'' ({{bib|KGP}}: 171 f., {{bib|GPN}}: 73 f., 177–179, {{bib|DLG}}: 116, {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 216 et passim, {{bib|Matasović 2009}}: 200, {{bib|Stüber 1998}}: 25, {{bib|Stüber 2005}}: 95, {{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 1999}}: 156, {{bib|Irslinger 2002}}: 58). A spanner is thrown in the works by the potential comparandum {{bib|RIG}} M-106 {{tr|lat|cicedu}}, which appears to be derived from {{m||kīk-}} 'flesh, muscle' ({{bib|DLG}}: 116) with the functionally unclear suffix {{m||-ed-}}, which is commonly attested in combination with ''on''-stems. (Cf. also {{bib|CIL}} XIII 2836 {{tr|lat|cicetius}}, probably a variant of either of the two.) See {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1979}}: 258 f., {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1981}}: 167 f., {{bib|Markey & Mees 2003}}: 140, {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 564, '''{{bib|Villar & Prósper 2005}}: 286'''.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 16:02, 5 December 2024

Attestation: VB·23 (kiketụ/ṛẹṭalos) (1)
Language: Celtic
Word Type: proper noun
Semantic Field: personal name

Grammatical Categories: nom. sg. masc.
Stem Class: on

Morphemic Analysis: king-et-ū or kīk-ed-ū
Phonemic Analysis: /kingetū/ or /kīkedū/
Meaning: 'Kiketu'

Commentary

Probably an on-stem personal name in the nominative, though a patronym formed with individualising or -ed- can maybe not be entirely excluded (see the inscription page).

Though the attested form is orthographically ambiguous, the most straight-forward analysis of the name is a hypocorism of a name in king-et- 'attacker, warrior, footsoldier' as in, e.g., CIL XIII 3707 cingetius, Caesar BG V.22.I cingetorix (KGP: 171 f., GPN: 73 f., 177–179, DLG: 116, Delamarre 2007: 216 et passim, Matasović 2009: 200, Stüber 1998: 25, Stüber 2005: 95, De Bernardo Stempel 1999: 156, Irslinger 2002: 58). A spanner is thrown in the works by the potential comparandum RIG M-106 cicedu, which appears to be derived from kīk- 'flesh, muscle' (DLG: 116) with the functionally unclear suffix -ed-, which is commonly attested in combination with on-stems. (Cf. also CIL XIII 2836 cicetius, probably a variant of either of the two.) See Tibiletti Bruno 1979: 258 f., Tibiletti Bruno 1981: 167 f., Markey & Mees 2003: 140, Morandi 2004: 564, Villar & Prósper 2005: 286.

Bibliography

CIL Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements)
De Bernardo Stempel 1999 Patrizia De Bernardo Stempel, Nominale Wortbildung des älteren Irischen. Stammbildung und Derivation [= Buchreihe der Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 15], Tübingen: Niemeyer 1999.
Delamarre 2007 Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007.
DLG Xavier Delamarre, Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. Une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental, 2nd, revised edition, Paris: Errance 2003.