)akur(: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{word | {{word | ||
|type_word= | |type_word=prob. proper noun | ||
|language= | |gender=indeterminable | ||
|linguistic_ascription= | |language=Celtic | ||
|linguistic_ascription=perhaps | |||
|analysis_morphemic=unknown | |analysis_morphemic=unknown | ||
|analysis_phonemic=unknown | |analysis_phonemic=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=cacurda Lochner von Hüttenbach 41 | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
The | The fragmentary sequence cannot be analysed grammatically or etymologically, but a personal name is likely. -''akur''- does not appear in names in any other Cisalpine Celtic inscriptions, but both -''akur''- and -''agur''- do occur in (more or less obviously Gaulish) names from Continental Celtic contexts, such as {{bib|RIIG}} [https://riig.huma-num.fr/documents/VAU-05-05 VAU-05-05] ({{bib|RIG}} G-121) {{tr|gr|μ̣αγουρειγ̣ι}} (Cavaillon), {{bib|RIG}} M-205 {{tr|lat|magurix}} (coin legend), {{bib|RIG}} L-18 {{tr|lat|dacurdus}}, the potter's name ''acurio'' ({{bib|Osw.}} 3), and assorted names in ''cacur''- ({{bib|AcS}} I: 668 f., {{bib|DLG}}: 96 – from ''cacu''- '?') and ''sacur''- ({{bib|AcS}} II: 1283, secondary from ''sacro''-?). Cf. also the (possibly Germanic) theonym {{bib|CIL}} XIII 8166, 8167 {{tr|lat|bacurdo}} (Köln). See also {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 204, {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 624. | ||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:21, 6 May 2025
| Attestation: | CO·2 (]ạḳụṛ[) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | perhaps Celtic |
| Word Type: | prob. proper noun |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | indeterminable |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | unknown |
| Phonemic Analysis: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
Commentary
The fragmentary sequence cannot be analysed grammatically or etymologically, but a personal name is likely. -akur- does not appear in names in any other Cisalpine Celtic inscriptions, but both -akur- and -agur- do occur in (more or less obviously Gaulish) names from Continental Celtic contexts, such as RIIG VAU-05-05 (RIG G-121) μ̣αγουρειγ̣ι (Cavaillon), RIG M-205 magurix (coin legend), RIG L-18 dacurdus, the potter's name acurio (Osw. 3), and assorted names in cacur- (AcS I: 668 f., DLG: 96 – from cacu- '?') and sacur- (AcS II: 1283, secondary from sacro-?). Cf. also the (possibly Germanic) theonym CIL XIII 8166, 8167 bacurdo (Köln). See also Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 204, Morandi 2004: 624.
Bibliography
| AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
|---|---|
| CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
| DLG | Xavier Delamarre, Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. Une approche linguistique du vieux-celtique continental, 2nd, revised edition, Paris: Errance 2003. |
