CO·33: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|word_number=2 | |word_number=2 | ||
|line_number=2 | |line_number=2 | ||
|corpus=Cisalpine Celtic | |||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
|object=CO·33 Rondineto | |object=CO·33 Rondineto | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
|type_inscription=unknown | |type_inscription=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|whatmough=298 ter | |whatmough=298 ter | ||
|solinas=92 | |solinas=92 | ||
|source_detail=Solinas 1995: 356 | |source_detail=Solinas 1995: 356 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=3 | ||
|problem= | |problem=Dublette, wie tun? | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
First published in {{bib|PID}}: 630, no. 298 ter. | |||
Included in the addenda of the {{bib|PID}} as seen by Conway in the museum in 1930; no images and not seen by anyone since. Highly likely to be a doublet, but of which inscription? {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 218 f., no. 44 suspects [[CO·30]] with the second line ''o'' due to a confusion with the number "o" of the entry in {{bib|Garovaglio 1879}}, but PID does not mention Garovaglio here, and the sinistroverse {{w||al}} could hardly be read as sinistroverse ''la''. I'm inclined to think [[CO·12]]; the reading ''o'' / ''la'' is without the incomplete letters at the breaking edge, and the letter height of 4 cm may mean both lines together – Whatmough often had trouble with Conway's autopsy notes. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:19, 7 December 2024
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Reading in transliteration: | o / la |
| Reading in original script: | unknown |
|
| |
| Object: | CO·33 Rondineto (unidentifiable) |
| Position: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Script: | unknown |
| Number of letters: | 3 |
| Number of words: | 2 |
| Number of lines: | 2 |
| Workmanship: | unknown |
| Condition: | unknown |
|
| |
| Archaeological culture: | unknown [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | unknown [from object] |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | Whatmough 1933 (PID): 298 ter Solinas 1995: 92 |
|
| |
| Sources: | Solinas 1995: 356 |
Commentary
First published in PID: 630, no. 298 ter.
Included in the addenda of the PID as seen by Conway in the museum in 1930; no images and not seen by anyone since. Highly likely to be a doublet, but of which inscription? Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 218 f., no. 44 suspects CO·30 with the second line o due to a confusion with the number "o" of the entry in Garovaglio 1879, but PID does not mention Garovaglio here, and the sinistroverse al could hardly be read as sinistroverse la. I'm inclined to think CO·12; the reading o / la is without the incomplete letters at the breaking edge, and the letter height of 4 cm may mean both lines together – Whatmough often had trouble with Conway's autopsy notes.
Bibliography
| Garovaglio 1879 | Alfonso Garovaglio, "Rondineto, altre scoperte", Rivista Archeologica della Provincia di Como 15 (1879), 18-21. |
|---|
