TI·35: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Image in {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, fig. 8 (photo). | Image in {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, fig. 8 (photo). | ||
The fragment preserves parts of two lines, each written inside frame lines. According to {{bib|Piana Agostinetti 2004}}: 156, the inscriptions ran from the bottom toward the top; differently {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, who assumes that they were horizontal (why?). Reading of the letters according to Tibiletti Bruno, who considers both lines to be complete on top – is the trace after kappa in line 1 the neck of the anthropomorphic frame? In that case, the stela could be classified as type C according to the typology of {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 206 – thus {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, although he, like {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, considers both lines to be incomplete also on top (]''osik''[ / ]''iuka''[). Morandi observes that an additional vertical line disturbs alpha in line 2 (]''osik''?[ / ]?''iukạị''[), possibly iota to form a feminine dative ending. | The fragment preserves parts of two lines, each written inside frame lines. According to {{bib|Piana Agostinetti 2004}}: 156, the inscriptions ran from the bottom toward the top (cf. [[TI·36.1]]/[[TI·36.2]]); differently {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, who assumes that they were horizontal (why?). Reading of the letters according to Tibiletti Bruno, who considers both lines to be complete on top – is the trace after kappa in line 1 the neck of the anthropomorphic frame? In that case, the stela could be classified as type C according to the typology of {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 206 – thus {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, although he, like {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, considers both lines to be incomplete also on top (]''osik''[ / ]''iuka''[). Morandi observes that an additional vertical line disturbs alpha in line 2 (]''osik''?[ / ]?''iukạị''[), possibly iota to form a feminine dative ending. | ||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | <p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 16:21, 14 October 2023
Inscription | |
---|---|
Reading in transliteration: | ]osik[ / ]?uka[ |
Reading in original script: | ][ ]?[ |
| |
Object: | TI·35 Ponte Capriasca (stela) |
Position: | front |
Orientation: | 270° |
Frame: | ?? (left: unknown, middle: all, right: unknown) |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Script: | North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet) |
Number of letters: | 7 |
Number of words: | 2 |
Number of lines: | 2 |
Workmanship: | carved |
Condition: | fragmentary |
| |
Archaeological culture: | La Tène B, La Tène C |
Date of inscription: | 4th–mid-2nd c. BC |
| |
Type: | unknown |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | Solinas 1995: 20 bis Motta 2000: 9 Morandi 2004: 33 |
| |
Sources: | Morandi 2004: 539 no. 33 |
Images
Stela fragment TI·35 Ponte Capriasca (photograph by C. Reguzzi)
|
Commentary
First published in Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 139 f.
Image in Motta 2000: 204, fig. 8 (photo).
The fragment preserves parts of two lines, each written inside frame lines. According to Piana Agostinetti 2004: 156, the inscriptions ran from the bottom toward the top (cf. TI·36.1/TI·36.2); differently Morandi 2004, who assumes that they were horizontal (why?). Reading of the letters according to Tibiletti Bruno, who considers both lines to be complete on top – is the trace after kappa in line 1 the neck of the anthropomorphic frame? In that case, the stela could be classified as type C according to the typology of De Marinis & Motta 1991: 206 – thus Motta 2000: 204, although he, like Morandi 2004, considers both lines to be incomplete also on top (]osik[ / ]iuka[). Morandi observes that an additional vertical line disturbs alpha in line 2 (]osik?[ / ]?iukạị[), possibly iota to form a feminine dative ending.
Bibliography
De Marinis & Motta 1991 | Raffaele C. De Marinis, Filippo Motta, "Una nuova iscrizione lepontica su pietra da Mezzovico (Lugano)", Sibrium 21 (1990–1991), 201–225. |
---|