CO·50: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
Image in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: tav. XXV.73 (photo). | Image in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 297, tav. XXV.73 (photo). | ||
At least three letters (hardly more than four all in all) inscribed on the foot of the vessel, applied before firing – a workman's signature? Only epsilon is clear; digamma is the only plausible option for the second letter, and only the bottom tip of a hasta is left of the third (read as iota by {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 229 f.). | At least three letters (hardly more than four all in all) inscribed on the foot of the vessel, applied before firing – a workman's signature? Only epsilon is clear; digamma is the only plausible option for the second letter, and only the bottom tip of a hasta is left of the third (read as iota by {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 229 f.). | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:49, 24 November 2024
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Reading in transliteration: | ev?[ |
| Reading in original script: | ]? 
|
|
| |
| Object: | CO·50 Prestino (unidentifiable) |
| Position: | foot, outside |
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Script: | North Italic script |
| Number of letters: | 3 |
| Number of words: | 1 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Workmanship: | scratched into leather-hard clay |
| Condition: | fragmentary |
|
| |
| Archaeological culture: | unknown [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | unknown [from object] |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | perhaps Celtic |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | Solinas 1995: 67 Morandi 2004: 182 |
|
| |
| Sources: | Morandi 2004: 640 |
Images
 Potsherd CO·50 Prestino with inscription CO·50 from Tibiletti Bruno 1969b
|
Commentary
Image in Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 297, tav. XXV.73 (photo).
At least three letters (hardly more than four all in all) inscribed on the foot of the vessel, applied before firing – a workman's signature? Only epsilon is clear; digamma is the only plausible option for the second letter, and only the bottom tip of a hasta is left of the third (read as iota by Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 229 f.).
