TI·35: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|object=TI·35 Ponte Capriasca | |object=TI·35 Ponte Capriasca | ||
|position=front | |position=front | ||
|orientation=270 | |||
|frame_left=unknown | |frame_left=unknown | ||
|frame_middle=all | |frame_middle=all | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
|workmanship=carved | |workmanship=carved | ||
|condition=fragmentary | |condition=fragmentary | ||
|culture_archaeological=La Tène B, La Tène C | |||
|sortdate=-325 | |||
|date=4<sup>th</sup>–mid-2<sup>nd</sup> c. BC | |||
|date_derivation=typology | |||
|type_inscription=unknown | |type_inscription=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
| Line 24: | Line 29: | ||
|morandi=33 | |morandi=33 | ||
|source_detail=Morandi 2004: 539 no. 33 | |source_detail=Morandi 2004: 539 no. 33 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=das sind eigentlich zwei Inschriften | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
Image in {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, fig. 8 (photo). | Image in {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, fig. 8 (photo). | ||
The fragment preserves parts of two lines, each written inside frame lines. Reading of the letters according to Tibiletti Bruno, who considers both lines to be complete on top – is the trace after kappa in line 1 the neck of the anthropomorphic frame? In that case, the stela could be classified as type C according to the typology of {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 206 – thus {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, although he, like {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, considers both lines to be incomplete also on top (]''osik''[ / ]''iuka''[). Morandi observes that an additional vertical line disturbs alpha in line 2 (]''osik''?[ / ]?''iukạị''[), possibly iota to form a feminine dative ending. | The fragment preserves parts of two lines, each written inside frame lines. According to {{bib|Piana Agostinetti 2004}}: 156, the inscriptions ran from the bottom toward the top; differently {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, who assumes that they were horizontal (why?). Reading of the letters according to Tibiletti Bruno, who considers both lines to be complete on top – is the trace after kappa in line 1 the neck of the anthropomorphic frame? In that case, the stela could be classified as type C according to the typology of {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 206 – thus {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 204, although he, like {{bib|Morandi 2004}}, considers both lines to be incomplete also on top (]''osik''[ / ]''iuka''[). Morandi observes that an additional vertical line disturbs alpha in line 2 (]''osik''?[ / ]?''iukạị''[), possibly iota to form a feminine dative ending. | ||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | <p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 14 October 2023
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Reading in transliteration: | ]osik[ / ]?uka[ |
| Reading in original script: | ]    []    ?[
|
|
| |
| Object: | TI·35 Ponte Capriasca (stela) |
| Position: | front |
| Orientation: | 270° |
| Frame: | ? ? (left: unknown, middle: all, right: unknown)
|
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Script: | North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet) |
| Number of letters: | 7 |
| Number of words: | 2 |
| Number of lines: | 2 |
| Workmanship: | carved |
| Condition: | fragmentary |
|
| |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène B, La Tène C |
| Date of inscription: | 4th–mid-2nd c. BC |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | Solinas 1995: 20 bis Motta 2000: 9 Morandi 2004: 33 |
|
| |
| Sources: | Morandi 2004: 539 no. 33 |
Images
 Stela fragment TI·35 Ponte Capriasca (photograph by C. Reguzzi)
|
 Fragment TI·35 Ponte Capriasca with inscription TI·35
|
Commentary
First published in Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 139 f.
Image in Motta 2000: 204, fig. 8 (photo).
The fragment preserves parts of two lines, each written inside frame lines. According to Piana Agostinetti 2004: 156, the inscriptions ran from the bottom toward the top; differently Morandi 2004, who assumes that they were horizontal (why?). Reading of the letters according to Tibiletti Bruno, who considers both lines to be complete on top – is the trace after kappa in line 1 the neck of the anthropomorphic frame? In that case, the stela could be classified as type C according to the typology of De Marinis & Motta 1991: 206 – thus Motta 2000: 204, although he, like Morandi 2004, considers both lines to be incomplete also on top (]osik[ / ]iuka[). Morandi observes that an additional vertical line disturbs alpha in line 2 (]osik?[ / ]?iukạị[), possibly iota to form a feminine dative ending.
Bibliography
| De Marinis & Motta 1991 | Raffaele C. De Marinis, Filippo Motta, "Una nuova iscrizione lepontica su pietra da Mezzovico (Lugano)", Sibrium 21 (1990–1991), 201–225. |
|---|
