CO·71: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 35: Line 35:
Images in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 273, tav. I.1a (drawing from '''{{bib|Giussani 1927}}: 147, fig. 8''') and 1b (photo), {{bib|Solinas 1995}}: tav. LXVII.d (photo), {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 621, fig. 20.147 (drawing).
Images in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 273, tav. I.1a (drawing from '''{{bib|Giussani 1927}}: 147, fig. 8''') and 1b (photo), {{bib|Solinas 1995}}: tav. LXVII.d (photo), {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 621, fig. 20.147 (drawing).


The remains of three lines are preserved on the roughly triangular fragment; they are separated by frame lines, but the frame above line 1 in Giussani's drawing is not certain. Line 1 ends on the fragment, while lines 2 and 3 are incomplete at both ends. Reading from {{bib|Whatmough 1933}} (PID): 630, no. 299 bis based on Giussani's drawing. The reading of lines 1 and 2 is clear, though only the tips of the three bars are left of epsilon in line 1, and the fourth bar of mu in line 2 may just be missing (pace {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 174); at the beginning of line 2 the very tip of a bar may be made out (ibid.). In line 3, which is not preserved in its full height at any point, the first preserved letter could as well be alpha; according to Solinas, only a single hasta can be made out today. The letters of line 1 are larger than those of line 2; {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 173 f., no. 1, assumes that line 2 predates the others. See also {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 142 f., {{bib|Prosdocimi 1986}}: 238, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1990b}}: 106 f.
The remains of three lines are preserved on the roughly triangular fragment; they are separated by frame lines, but the frame above line 1 in Giussani's drawing is not certain. Line 1 ends on the fragment, while lines 2 and 3 are incomplete at both ends. Reading from {{bib|Whatmough 1933}} (PID): 630, no. 299 bis based on Giussani's drawing. The reading of lines 1 and 2 is clear, though only the tips of the three bars are left of epsilon in line 1, and the fourth bar of mu in line 2 may just be missing (pace {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 174); at the beginning of line 2 the very tip of a bar may be made out (ibid.). In line 3, which is not preserved in its full height at any point, the first preserved letter could as well be alpha; according to Solinas, only a single hasta can be made out today. The letters of line 1 are larger than those of line 2; {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 173 f., no. 1, assumes that line 2 predates the others. See also {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 142 f., {{bib|Prosdocimi 1986}}: 238, {{bib|Prosdocimi 1987}}: 574, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1990b}}: 106 f.


Dated palaeographically to the 5<sup>th</sup> century BC by Morandi.
Dated palaeographically to the 5<sup>th</sup> century BC by Morandi.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 18:21, 25 January 2025

Inscription
Reading in transliteration: ]ẹna / ]ones : ṃ[ / ]ẹị[
Reading in original script: A8 sN sE s[
]M4 sseparator3 sS2 dE sN sO s[
]I sE s[

Object: CO·71 San Fermo della Battaglia (slab)
Position: front
Frame: ?betweenbetween?  (left: unknown, middle: between, right: unknown)
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Script: North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet)
Letter height: 12–15 cm4.724 in <br />5.906 in <br />
Number of letters: 10–11
Number of words: 4
Number of lines: 3
Workmanship: carved
Condition: fragmentary

Archaeological culture: unknown [from object]
Date of inscription: unknown [from object]

Type: unknown
Language: prob. Celtic
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: Whatmough 1933 (PID): 299 bis
Solinas 1995: 95
Morandi 2004: 147

Sources: Morandi 2004: 622 f. no. 147

Images

Commentary

First published in Giussani 1927: 145–148.

Images in Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 273, tav. I.1a (drawing from Giussani 1927: 147, fig. 8) and 1b (photo), Solinas 1995: tav. LXVII.d (photo), Morandi 2004: 621, fig. 20.147 (drawing).

The remains of three lines are preserved on the roughly triangular fragment; they are separated by frame lines, but the frame above line 1 in Giussani's drawing is not certain. Line 1 ends on the fragment, while lines 2 and 3 are incomplete at both ends. Reading from Whatmough 1933 (PID): 630, no. 299 bis based on Giussani's drawing. The reading of lines 1 and 2 is clear, though only the tips of the three bars are left of epsilon in line 1, and the fourth bar of mu in line 2 may just be missing (pace Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 174); at the beginning of line 2 the very tip of a bar may be made out (ibid.). In line 3, which is not preserved in its full height at any point, the first preserved letter could as well be alpha; according to Solinas, only a single hasta can be made out today. The letters of line 1 are larger than those of line 2; Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 173 f., no. 1, assumes that line 2 predates the others. See also Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 142 f., Prosdocimi 1986: 238, Prosdocimi 1987: 574, Tibiletti Bruno 1990b: 106 f.

Dated palaeographically to the 5th century BC by Morandi.

Bibliography