TI·34.2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
First published in {{bib|Giussani 1902}}: 25–31. Currently untraceable. | First published in {{bib|Giussani 1902}}: 25–31. Currently untraceable. | ||
Images in {{bib|Giussani 1902}}: 26, fig. 1 (drawing), {{bib|Rhŷs 1914}}: tav. Ia (photo), {{bib|Crivelli 1943}}: 33, fig. 52 (photo = {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: fig. 4), {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1990b}}: 81 (drawing), {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 208, fig. 4 (drawing). | Images in {{bib|Giussani 1902}}: 26, fig. 1 (drawing), {{bib|Rhŷs 1914}}: tav. Ia (photo), {{bib|Crivelli 1943}}: 33, fig. 52 (photo = {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: fig. 4), {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1990b}}: 81 (drawing), {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 208, fig. 4 (drawing), {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 536, fig. 9.32A. | ||
Inscribed inside an rectangular frame, which shares one line with the frame of [[TI·34.1]]. The letters are well legible; the reading ''otios'' goes back to Giussani and has generally not been doubted. Whatmough's appealing suggestion ({{bib|PID}}: 85) that {{w||otiui}} is incomplete ''piuotiui'' (cf. {{w||piuontialui}}) is rendered implausible by the complete absence of traces to the right of the vertical frame line before omicron. It cannot be entirely excluded that the latter is iota rather than a line closing the frame, but the presence of a vertical frame line at the end makes this unlikely. | Inscribed inside an rectangular frame, which shares one line with the frame of [[TI·34.1]]. The letters are well legible; the reading ''otios'' goes back to Giussani and has generally not been doubted. Whatmough's appealing suggestion ({{bib|PID}}: 85) that {{w||otiui}} is incomplete ''piuotiui'' (cf. {{w||piuontialui}}) is rendered implausible by the complete absence of traces to the right of the vertical frame line before omicron. It cannot be entirely excluded that the latter is iota rather than a line closing the frame, but the presence of a vertical frame line at the end makes this unlikely. |
Latest revision as of 15:13, 29 July 2024
Inscription | |
---|---|
Reading in transliteration: | otiui : pala |
Reading in original script: | |
| |
Object: | TI·34 Capriasca (stela) (Inscriptions: TI·34.1, TI·34.2, TI·34.3) |
Position: | back |
Orientation: | 270° |
Frame: | (left: straight, middle: top and bottom, right: straight) |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Script: | North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet) |
Letter height: | 15 cm5.906 in <br /> |
Number of letters: | 9 |
Number of words: | 2 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Workmanship: | carved |
Condition: | complete, damaged |
| |
Archaeological culture: | La Tène B, La Tène C |
Date of inscription: | 4th–mid-2nd c. BC (?) |
| |
Type: | funerary |
Language: | Celtic |
Meaning: | 'pala for Otios' |
| |
Alternative sigla: | Whatmough 1933 (PID): 268 a Solinas 1995: 27 Ab Motta 2000: 5 A2 Morandi 2004: 32 Ab |
| |
Sources: | Morandi 2004: 538 no. 32 Ab |
Images
Commentary
First published in Giussani 1902: 25–31. Currently untraceable.
Images in Giussani 1902: 26, fig. 1 (drawing), Rhŷs 1914: tav. Ia (photo), Crivelli 1943: 33, fig. 52 (photo = Tibiletti Bruno 1997: fig. 4), Tibiletti Bruno 1990b: 81 (drawing), De Marinis & Motta 1991: 208, fig. 4 (drawing), Morandi 2004: 536, fig. 9.32A.
Inscribed inside an rectangular frame, which shares one line with the frame of TI·34.1. The letters are well legible; the reading otios goes back to Giussani and has generally not been doubted. Whatmough's appealing suggestion (PID: 85) that otiui is incomplete piuotiui (cf. piuontialui) is rendered implausible by the complete absence of traces to the right of the vertical frame line before omicron. It cannot be entirely excluded that the latter is iota rather than a line closing the frame, but the presence of a vertical frame line at the end makes this unlikely.
Tibiletti Bruno 1970: 374 f. (also 1978: 137 f., 1990b: 89 f., 1997: 1005 f.) argues convincingly that this inscription and TI·34.1 are younger than TI·34.3 on the opposite side, since they and their frames are complete and appear to have been applied when the stone was already fragmentary (also Piana Agostinetti 2004: 157; the opposite position in De Marinis & Motta 1991: 218, Motta 2000: 200, no. 5 and Morandi 2004). Since the present inscription and TI·34.1 were not applied by the same engraver (shape of alpha, upsilon), TI·34.2 is also likely somewhat younger than TI·34.1, added in a non-anthropomorphic frame which utilises one of TI·34.1's frame lines.
The inscription names the deceased only by his individual name (see otiui), cf. the other inscriptions on this stone and possibly some of the inscriptions from Aranno.
See also Motta & Ricci 1908: 28 f., Rhŷs 1913: 14 f., no. 2, Jacobsohn 1927: 31, no. 197b, Tibiletti Bruno 1975: 53.
Bibliography
Crivelli 1943 | Aldo Crivelli, Atlante preistorico e storico della Svizzera Italiana. Vol. 1: Dalle origini alla civiltà romana, Bellinzona: Istituto Editoriale Ticinese 1943. |
---|---|
De Marinis & Motta 1991 | Raffaele C. De Marinis, Filippo Motta, "Una nuova iscrizione lepontica su pietra da Mezzovico (Lugano)", Sibrium 21 (1990–1991), 201–225. |