pe (enclitic): Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Corinna Salomon moved page -pe to pe (enclitic) without leaving a redirect) |
|
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 20:25, 5 November 2024
Attestation: | VB·3.1 (latumarui:sapsutai:pe:uinom:natom) (1) |
---|---|
Language: | Celtic |
Word Type: | particle |
| |
Grammatical Categories: | |
| |
Morphemic Analysis: | -pe |
Phonemic Analysis: | -/pe/ |
Meaning: | 'and' |
Commentary
First segmented and identified as an enclitic coordinating conjunction by Torp 1897: 4 and Kretschmer 1905: 100, -pe < PIE *-ku̯e remains the only securely attested conjunction in Cisalpine Celtic. As noted by Lejeune 1971: 79 f., -pe with /ku̯/ > /p/ corresponds to Celtiberian -kue and Italic forms (Latin -que, Faliscan -cue, Venetic -kve) in free use, while Transalpine Gaulish only attests incorporated apocopated -k (with /ku̯/ > /k/ in word-final position) in RIIG CDO-01-19 (RIG L-13) etic < h₁eti-ku̯e (also at Chamalières), booking the form (p. 114) as a specifically Lepontic one (cf. De Hoz 1992: 228, Eska 1998: 7). See also Matasović 2009: 175 f.
Bibliography
De Hoz 1992 | Javier de Hoz, "Lepontic, Celt-Iberian, Gaulish and the archaeological evidence", Études celtiques 29 (1992), 223–240. |
---|---|
Eska 1998 | Joseph F. Eska, "The linguistic position of Lepontic", in: Benjamin K. Bergin, Madelaine C. Plauché, Ashlee Bailey (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Special Session on Indo-European Subgrouping and Internal Relations, Berkeley, CA: 1998, 2–11. |