CO·13: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Images in '''{{bib|Garovaglio 1879}}: tav. II c (drawing = {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 278, tav. VI.8a)''', {{bib|Rhŷs 1914}}: pl. III (photo), {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 278, tav. VI.8b (photo = {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 800, tav. XXIII.160), {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 628, fig. 20.160 (drawing). | Images in '''{{bib|Garovaglio 1879}}: tav. II c (drawing = {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 278, tav. VI.8a)''', {{bib|Rhŷs 1914}}: pl. III (photo), {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 278, tav. VI.8b (photo = {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 800, tav. XXIII.160), {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 628, fig. 20.160 (drawing). | ||
Inscribed on the inside of the patera across two fragments, between frame lines. The larger fragment was seen in the museum by {{bib|Rhŷs 1913}}: 39, III.1.3, who could not quite make a reading; {{bib|Rhŷs 1914}}: 9 f. tried an upside-down dextroverse reading ]''rkiumu''[ with inverted mu. Sinistroverse ]''rḳịmu''[ from Whatmough {{bib|PID}}: 102, no. 295 (also Solinas), who calls ''ki'' "at least doubtful", and "the whole [...] altogether problematical, though it can hardly be mere ornamentation". Referring to Garovaglio's drawing of both fragments, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 189 f., no. 8 adds a iota at the end ({{w||)rkimui}}), despite the line being decidedly oblique (also {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 147, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1990b}}: 109 f.). {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 72 f., n. 251, noting the short oblique trace in the upper area before rho, infers upsilon (]''ụrkimu''[''i''], cf. Morandi ]?''rkimu''[, who prefers epsilon to compare ''bergimus''). The unidentifiable letter after rho together with the uninterrupted zig-zag (cf. [[NO·1]] and, with Whatmough, [[TI·1]]) make the inscription somewhat dubious – possibly pseudo-script? But cf. [[TI·34.3]] ]{{w||)rkomui|rkomui}}. | Inscribed on the inside of the patera across two fragments, between frame lines. The larger fragment was seen in the museum by {{bib|Rhŷs 1913}}: 39, III.1.3, who could not quite make a reading; {{bib|Rhŷs 1914}}: 9 f. tried an upside-down dextroverse reading ]''rkiumu''[ with inverted mu. Sinistroverse ]''rḳịmu''[ from Whatmough {{bib|PID}}: 102, no. 295 (also Solinas), who calls ''ki'' "at least doubtful", and "the whole [...] altogether problematical, though it can hardly be mere ornamentation". Referring to Garovaglio's drawing of both fragments, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1969b}}: 189 f., no. 8 adds a iota at the end ({{w||)rkimui}}), despite the line being decidedly oblique (also {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 147, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1990b}}: 109 f.). {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 72 f., n. 251, noting the short oblique trace in the upper area before rho, infers upsilon (]''ụrkimu''[''i''], cf. Morandi ]?''rkimu''[, who prefers epsilon to compare ''bergimus''). The unidentifiable letter after rho (cf. [[CO·14]]) together with the uninterrupted zig-zag (cf. [[NO·1]] and, with Whatmough, [[TI·1]]) make the inscription somewhat dubious – possibly pseudo-script? But cf. [[TI·34.3]] ]{{w||)rkomui|rkomui}}. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:17, 2 December 2024
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Reading in transliteration: | ]?rḳịmụ[ |
| Reading in original script: | ]     ?[
|
|
| |
| Object: | CO·13 Rondineto (bowl) |
| Position: | bottom, inside |
| Orientation: | 0° |
| Frame: | ? ? (left: unknown, middle: top and bottom, right: unknown)
|
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Script: | prob. North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet) |
| Letter height: | 2.5 cm0.984 in <br /> |
| Number of letters: | 5 |
| Number of words: | 1 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Workmanship: | scratched after firing |
| Condition: | fragmentary |
|
| |
| Archaeological culture: | Golasecca III A 2 [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | advanced 5th c. BC [from object] |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | perhaps Celtic |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | Whatmough 1933 (PID): 295 Solinas 1995: 86 Morandi 2004: 160 |
|
| |
| Sources: | Morandi 2004: 629 |
Images
 Drawing of inscription CO·13 from Morandi 2004
|
 Potsherd CO·13 Rondineto with inscription CO·13 from Morandi 2004
|
 Garovaglio's drawing of CO·13 Rondineto with inscription CO·13 from Tibiletti Bruno 1969b
|
 Potsherd CO·13 Rondineto with inscription CO·13 from Tibiletti Bruno 1969b
|
Commentary
Images in Garovaglio 1879: tav. II c (drawing = Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 278, tav. VI.8a), Rhŷs 1914: pl. III (photo), Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 278, tav. VI.8b (photo = Morandi 2004: 800, tav. XXIII.160), Morandi 2004: 628, fig. 20.160 (drawing).
Inscribed on the inside of the patera across two fragments, between frame lines. The larger fragment was seen in the museum by Rhŷs 1913: 39, III.1.3, who could not quite make a reading; Rhŷs 1914: 9 f. tried an upside-down dextroverse reading ]rkiumu[ with inverted mu. Sinistroverse ]rḳịmu[ from Whatmough PID: 102, no. 295 (also Solinas), who calls ki "at least doubtful", and "the whole [...] altogether problematical, though it can hardly be mere ornamentation". Referring to Garovaglio's drawing of both fragments, Tibiletti Bruno 1969b: 189 f., no. 8 adds a iota at the end ()rkimui), despite the line being decidedly oblique (also Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 147, Tibiletti Bruno 1990b: 109 f.). Lejeune 1971: 72 f., n. 251, noting the short oblique trace in the upper area before rho, infers upsilon (]ụrkimu[i], cf. Morandi ]?rkimu[, who prefers epsilon to compare bergimus). The unidentifiable letter after rho (cf. CO·14) together with the uninterrupted zig-zag (cf. NO·1 and, with Whatmough, TI·1) make the inscription somewhat dubious – possibly pseudo-script? But cf. TI·34.3 ]rkomui.
Bibliography
| Garovaglio 1879 | Alfonso Garovaglio, "Rondineto, altre scoperte", Rivista Archeologica della Provincia di Como 15 (1879), 18-21. |
|---|
