teromui: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|case=dat. | |case=dat. | ||
|gender=masc. | |gender=masc. | ||
|language= | |language=Celtic | ||
|linguistic_ascription= | |linguistic_ascription=perhaps | ||
|analysis_morphemic= | |analysis_morphemic=terom{{m|-ūi̯}} | ||
|analysis_phonemic= | |analysis_phonemic=?????{{p|ūi̯}} | ||
|meaning= | |meaning='for Teromos' | ||
|field_semantic=personal name | |field_semantic=personal name | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=2 | ||
|problem= | |problem=Delamarre, teutomus Meid | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
''o''-stem personal name in the dative; the base ''terom''-/''derom''- finds no comparanda in Transalpine Gaulish (cf. {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 65, n. 225 "obscur"). If Celtic, -''om''- would appear to be a suffix added to a base ''t''/''de''/''ēr''-, cf. maybe {{w||)rkomui|]rkomui}} and ''teutomus'' in Pannonia ({{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: '''?'''; though different analyses are possible for both). Forms like ''derus'', ''derro'', ''derulo'', which are taken from Holder ({{bib|AcS}} I: 1267–1270) and often compared for the base (e.g. {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 139, {{bib|De Marinis & Motta 1991}}: 222, '''{{bib|Motta 2000}}: 199'''), are isolated and mostly associated with the Iberian area (Aquitania). Cf. possibly {{w||terialui}} (dubious reading). | |||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 13 January 2024
| Attestation: | TI·26 (teromui:kualui) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | perhaps Celtic |
| Word Type: | proper noun |
| Semantic Field: | personal name |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | dat. sg. masc. |
| Stem Class: | o |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | terom-ūi̯ |
| Phonemic Analysis: | ?????ūi̯ |
| Meaning: | 'for Teromos' |
Commentary
o-stem personal name in the dative; the base terom-/derom- finds no comparanda in Transalpine Gaulish (cf. Lejeune 1971: 65, n. 225 "obscur"). If Celtic, -om- would appear to be a suffix added to a base t/de/ēr-, cf. maybe ]rkomui and teutomus in Pannonia (Delamarre 2007: ?; though different analyses are possible for both). Forms like derus, derro, derulo, which are taken from Holder (AcS I: 1267–1270) and often compared for the base (e.g. Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 139, De Marinis & Motta 1991: 222, Motta 2000: 199), are isolated and mostly associated with the Iberian area (Aquitania). Cf. possibly terialui (dubious reading).
Bibliography
| AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
|---|---|
| De Marinis & Motta 1991 | Raffaele C. De Marinis, Filippo Motta, "Una nuova iscrizione lepontica su pietra da Mezzovico (Lugano)", Sibrium 21 (1990–1991), 201–225. |
