)?uka(: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Corinna Salomon moved page )?uka?( to )?uka( without leaving a redirect)
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
|status=probable
|status=probable
|type_word=undeterminable
|type_word=undeterminable
|gender=indeterminable
|language=unknown
|language=unknown
|analysis_morphemic=unknown
|analysis_morphemic=
|analysis_phonemic=unknown
|analysis_phonemic=
|meaning=undeterminable
|meaning=unknown
|checklevel=2
|checklevel=0
|problem=on the picture TI·35 the letters cannot be recognised clearly
}}
}}
==Commentary==
==Commentary==
The attested form is too fragmentary to be amenable to an etymological analysis. The sequence ''uka'' appears also in [[ritukalos]] ([[MI·7]])
See the inscription page on the reading.
 
The fragmentary sequence is typologically most likely to represent the remains of a personal name (individual name or patronym); the sequence °''uka''° is common in Celtic onomastics, in names with bases ending in °''uk''- (e.g. {{m||leu̯k-}}) and names derived with suffix {{m||-uk-}}.
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p>
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 21:30, 15 January 2024


Attestation: TI·35 (]osik[/]?uka[) (1)
Status: probable
Language: unknown
Word Type: undeterminable

Grammatical Categories: indeterminable

Morphemic Analysis:
Phonemic Analysis:
Meaning: unknown

Commentary

See the inscription page on the reading.

The fragmentary sequence is typologically most likely to represent the remains of a personal name (individual name or patronym); the sequence °uka° is common in Celtic onomastics, in names with bases ending in °uk- (e.g. leu̯k-) and names derived with suffix -uk-.

Corinna Salomon