MI·21
Inscription | |
---|---|
Reading in transliteration: | tuit |
Reading in original script: | |
| |
Object: | MI·21 Milano (bowl) |
Position: | bottom, outside |
Orientation: | 0° |
Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
Script: | unknown |
Letter height: | 3–3.9 cm1.181 in <br />1.535 in <br /> |
Number of letters: | 4 |
Number of words: | 1 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Workmanship: | scratched after firing |
Condition: | complete |
| |
Archaeological culture: | La Tène B 2 [from object] |
Date of inscription: | first half of 3rd c. BC [from object] |
| |
Type: | unknown |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | none |
| |
Sources: | Casini & Motta 2011: 461–464 |
Images
Commentary
First published in Casini & Motta 2011: 461–464, no. 3. Examined for LexLep on 26th April 2022.
Images in Casini & Motta 2011: 462, fig. 2 (drawing = Casini & Tizzoni 2015: 105, fig. 30.2 and photo).
Inscribed at a slight angle on the bottom of the bowl (length 6 cm; St. Andrew's cross 1 cm from the breaking edge). The reading tuit, given by Casini & Motta, is the most likely based on the execution of the scratches, but by no means certain: the writing direction is ambiguous (tiut?), the lines of putative upsilon do not touch (tiiit?), and the forms are quite basic – a non-script mark or pseudo-script cannot be excluded, also with regard to the difficulty of linguistic interpretation (see the word page). Casini & Motta 2011: 464 suggest that the sequence tuit is misspelled, viz. that iota and the second St. Andrew's cross are switched, and the form is an abbreviation of a name in tutio(, but this is more than the evidence can carry.
Bibliography
Casini & Motta 2011 | Stefania Casini, Filippo Motta, "Alcune iscrizioni preromane inedite da Milano", Notizie Archeologiche Bergomensi 19 (2011), 459–469. |
---|---|
Casini & Tizzoni 2015 | Stefania Casini, Marco Tizzoni, "Via Moneta: analisi culturale delle fasi preromane", Notizie Archeologiche Bergomensi 23 (2015), 69–176. |