-et-: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
The Celtic languages have a comparatively large number of formations of the nominalising PIE suffix *-''t''- with ablaut in the suffix -''et''-/-''ot''- (always with one grade generalised in Celtic). See {{bib|Irslinger 2002}} passim, esp. 46 f. In Gaulish, the ''e''-grade suffix is attested in a handful of PNN (e.g., *''cinget''- 'warrior' in ''vercingetorix'', see {{m||king-}}) and ethnonyms (e.g. ''nemetes''; {{bib|Lambert 1994}}: 34). Gaulish -''et''- is considered to have agentive function by, e.g., {{bib|Hamp 1988}}: 54; see {{bib|Irslinger 2002}}: 67 f. for details. | The Celtic languages have a comparatively large number of formations of the nominalising PIE suffix *-''t''- with ablaut in the suffix -''et''-/-''ot''- (always with one grade generalised in Celtic). See {{bib|Irslinger 2002}} passim, esp. 46 f. In Gaulish, the ''e''-grade suffix is attested in a handful of PNN (e.g., *''cinget''- 'warrior' in ''vercingetorix'', see {{m||king-}}) and ethnonyms (e.g. ''nemetes''; {{bib|Lambert 1994}}: 34). Gaulish -''et''- is considered to have agentive function by, e.g., {{bib|Hamp 1988}}: 54; see {{bib|Irslinger 2002}}: 67 f. for details. See also {{bib|Repanšek 2014}}: 245–251. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:29, 7 June 2024
| Type: | derivational |
|---|---|
| Function: | agentive |
| Language: | Celtic |
| Phonemic analysis: | -/et/- |
| From PIE: | *-(e)t- |
| From Proto-Celtic: | *-et- |
| Attestation: | aśkoneti, aśkonetio, kiketu, pirauiχeś, piretos, plialeθu, sekezos, seχeθu |
Commentary
The Celtic languages have a comparatively large number of formations of the nominalising PIE suffix *-t- with ablaut in the suffix -et-/-ot- (always with one grade generalised in Celtic). See Irslinger 2002 passim, esp. 46 f. In Gaulish, the e-grade suffix is attested in a handful of PNN (e.g., *cinget- 'warrior' in vercingetorix, see king-) and ethnonyms (e.g. nemetes; Lambert 1994: 34). Gaulish -et- is considered to have agentive function by, e.g., Hamp 1988: 54; see Irslinger 2002: 67 f. for details. See also Repanšek 2014: 245–251.
