plialeθu
Attestation: | CO·48 (uvamokozis:plialeθu:uvltiauiopos:ariuonepos:siteś:tetu) (1) |
---|---|
Language: | Lepontic |
Word Type: | proper noun |
Semantic Field: | prob. patronymic |
| |
Grammatical Categories: | nom. sg. animate |
Stem Class: | on |
| |
Morphemic Analysis: | bli-all-et-ū or pli-al-ed-ū |
Phonemic Analysis: | /blialletū/ or /plialedū/ |
Meaning: | 'Plialeθu' (?) |
Commentary
1) < *bli-alletos; <θ> stands for /t/ (Lejeune 1971: 59, fn. 168, fn. 169, 70, 99-100), or related to *Blios (of plioiso)? (Motta 2000: 198)
2) plios- is also known from plialo- (?) and Lat. Plinius and Pliamnus (cf. Gambari & Colonna 1986: 135, Tibiletti Bruno 1989: 103-104, Markey & Mees 2003: 141, 146-149) Gentilicum related to Plinius? (cp. Markey & Mees 2003: 140-142, 144, Morandi 1999: 183, Gambari & Colonna 1986: 135, Suetonius: Illustr. frag. 80 in Reifferschied 1860: 92, CIL: V 5262, 5361, pars 2 p. 1123, Münzer et al. 1951: (Plinius in Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der Altertumswissenschaft XXI, 1) 269-284, 456-457).
De Hoz 1990: 320 f. suggests that some of the Lepontic PNN in -u, particularly second names without patronymic suffixes, are patronyms formed with a gen. sg. ending -ū which derives from the ablative ending *-ōd (cf. affirmative Lejeune 1990: 77; Motta 2000: 197, Eska 1998c: 67, Eska 1995: 35-6, fn. 11, fn. 15, see also Tibiletti Bruno 1966b: 301, 316, (cf. commentary of Campanile 1968: 210), Tibiletti Bruno 1968: 388, Lejeune 1971: 53, Prosdocimi 1991: 160-161, Bader 1991: 95).
For other interpretations see Eska 1995: 36 fn. 10, Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 142, Tibiletti Bruno 1981: 179, Motta 1983: 65, Prosdocimi 1967: 216-217 (= verbum, cf. commentary of Campanile 1968: 212-213), Prosdocimi 1986: 235-236, 238-239 (appositive, second name element or verbum), Markey & Mees 2003: 138, 140 f.
See also Uhlich 1999: 293, Lejeune 1971: 21-22, 50, Eska & Mercado 2005: 178, fn. 41, Meid 1999: 17, Stüber 1998: 108, Villar & Prósper 2005: 344, Delamarre 2007: 149, cp. seχeθu, oletu, kiketu.
Bibliography
Bader 1991 | Françoise Bader, "Problématique du génitif thématique sigmatique", Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 86/1 (1991), 89–157. |
---|---|
Campanile 1968 | Enrico Campanile, "Su Due Interpretazioni dell'Iscrizione di Prestino", Studi e Saggi Linguistici 8 (1968), 207-213. |
CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
De Hoz 1990 | Javier de Hoz, "El genitivo celtico de los temas en -o-", in: Francisco Villar (ed.), Studia indogermanica et palaeohispanica in honorem Antonio Tovar et Luis Michelena, Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca 1990, 315–329. |
Delamarre 2007 | Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007. |
Eska & Mercado 2005 | Joseph Francis Eska, Angelo O. Mercado, "Observations on verbal art in ancient Vergiate", Historische Sprachforschung 118 (2005), 160-184. |
Eska 1995 | Joseph F. Eska, "Observations on the thematic genitive singular in Lepontic and Hispano-Celtic", in: Joseph F. Eska, R. Geraint Gruffydd, Nicolas Jacobs (eds), Hispano-Gallo-Brittonica. Essays in honour of Professor D. Ellis Evans on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, Cardiff: University of Wales Press 1995, 33–46. |
Eska 1998c | Josef Francis Eska, "PIE *p (doesn't become) Ø in proto Celtic", Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 58 (1998), 63-80. |
Gambari & Colonna 1988 | Filippo Maria Gambari, Giovanni Colonna, "Il bicchiere con iscrizione arcaica da Castelletto Ticino e l'adozione della scrittura nell'Italia nord-occidentale", Studi Etruschi 54 (1986 [1988]), 119–164. |