sabi: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|case=gen. | |case=gen. | ||
|gender=masc. | |gender=masc. | ||
|language= | |language=Latin | ||
|linguistic_ascription=prob. | |linguistic_ascription=prob. | ||
|analysis_morphemic={{m|sab-}}{{m|-ī|ī}} | |analysis_morphemic={{m|sab-}}{{m|-ī|ī}} | ||
|analysis_phonemic={{p|s}}{{p|a}}{{p|b}}{{p|ī}} | |analysis_phonemic=/{{p|s}}{{p|a}}{{p|b}}{{p|ī}}/ | ||
|meaning= | |meaning='of Sabos' (?) | ||
|field_semantic= | |field_semantic=personal name | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
''sabi'', attested in Latin script, may be an abbreviation, but is probably a genitive (cf. {{w||cesii}}, {{w||pusionis}}, {{w||)antionis}}, {{w||onesi}}). The grammar may be Latin, and the base is not likely to be Celtic either. {{bib|Kretschmer 1905}}: 125 notes the many names in ''sab''- attested in the Ligurian area – cf. the topo- and hydronyms listed in {{bib|AcS}} II: 1267–1272; while some of Holder's forms in ''sab''- may be Celtic (e.g. {{bib|CIL}} XIII 2761 {{tr|lat|sabius}}), the overall picture speaks against it (cf. {{bib|Meid 2005}}: 281). If the form is an abbrevation, Latin ''sabinus'' (attested in Castellamonte, s. {{bib|Untermann 1960}}; 294) can be compared. A connection with {{w||sapsutai}}, suggested by {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 146, is improbable due to /{{p||s}}/ in the latter form. | |||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 11:41, 23 August 2024
| Attestation: | VB·11 (sabi) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | prob. Latin |
| Word Type: | proper noun |
| Semantic Field: | personal name |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | gen. sg. masc. |
| Stem Class: | o |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | sab-ī |
| Phonemic Analysis: | /sabī/ |
| Meaning: | 'of Sabos' (?) |
Commentary
sabi, attested in Latin script, may be an abbreviation, but is probably a genitive (cf. cesii, pusionis, )antionis, onesi). The grammar may be Latin, and the base is not likely to be Celtic either. Kretschmer 1905: 125 notes the many names in sab- attested in the Ligurian area – cf. the topo- and hydronyms listed in AcS II: 1267–1272; while some of Holder's forms in sab- may be Celtic (e.g. CIL XIII 2761 sabius), the overall picture speaks against it (cf. Meid 2005: 281). If the form is an abbrevation, Latin sabinus (attested in Castellamonte, s. Untermann 1960; 294) can be compared. A connection with sapsutai, suggested by Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 146, is improbable due to /s/ in the latter form.
Bibliography
| AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
|---|---|
| CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
