sapsutai: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{word | {{word | ||
|type_word=proper noun | |type_word=proper noun | ||
|stem_class=ā | |stem_class=ā | ||
Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
|case=dat. | |case=dat. | ||
|gender=fem. | |gender=fem. | ||
|language= | |language=unknown | ||
|analysis_morphemic= | |language_adaptation=Celtic | ||
|analysis_phonemic={{p| | |analysis_morphemic=sapsut{{m|-āi̯}} | ||
|meaning= | |analysis_phonemic=/??????{{p|āi̯}}/ | ||
|meaning='to/for Sapsuta' | |||
|field_semantic=personal name | |field_semantic=personal name | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
''ā''-stem personal name in the dative. While the ending is clearly Celtic, and the suffix may be, the base is not etymologically Celtic. A fully Celtic etymology is attempted by {{bib|Rhŷs 1913}}: 65 f., who notes that a suffix -''ūto''- is listed by Holder {{bib|AcS}} III: 56 and compares the base with Gaul. *''sap''- 'fir/pine' reconstructed from Latin and Romance loanwords ('little pine'). /{{p||s}}/ between base and suffix, however, poses a problem, both in terms of the formation and because */{{p||p}}{{p||s}}/ > /{{p||k}}{{p||s}}/ in Celtic. While ''saps''- thus cannot be Celtic, ''sab-s''- could be in principle, but is no more convincing; a base ''sab''- is more common in the Ligurian than the Celtic area (see {{w||sabi}}) and may indicate the origin of a non-Celtic base 'sabs''-. | |||
See also {{bib|Lattes 1896}}: 105. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 18:06, 13 September 2024
Attestation: | VB·3.1 (latumarui:sapsutai:pe:uinom:natom) (1) |
---|---|
Language: | unknown |
adapted to: | Celtic |
Word Type: | proper noun |
Semantic Field: | personal name |
| |
Grammatical Categories: | dat. sg. fem. |
Stem Class: | ā |
| |
Morphemic Analysis: | sapsut-āi̯ |
Phonemic Analysis: | /??????āi̯/ |
Meaning: | 'to/for Sapsuta' |
Commentary
ā-stem personal name in the dative. While the ending is clearly Celtic, and the suffix may be, the base is not etymologically Celtic. A fully Celtic etymology is attempted by Rhŷs 1913: 65 f., who notes that a suffix -ūto- is listed by Holder AcS III: 56 and compares the base with Gaul. *sap- 'fir/pine' reconstructed from Latin and Romance loanwords ('little pine'). /s/ between base and suffix, however, poses a problem, both in terms of the formation and because */ps/ > /ks/ in Celtic. While saps- thus cannot be Celtic, sab-s- could be in principle, but is no more convincing; a base sab- is more common in the Ligurian than the Celtic area (see sabi) and may indicate the origin of a non-Celtic base 'sabs-.
See also Lattes 1896: 105.
Bibliography
AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
---|---|
CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
Eska 1998c | Josef Francis Eska, "PIE *p (doesn't become) Ø in proto Celtic", Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 58 (1998), 63-80. |