aśkoneti: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|gender=masc. | |gender=masc. | ||
|language=Celtic | |language=Celtic | ||
|analysis_morphemic={{m|ad-}}{{m|gon(n)-|gonn}}{{m|-et-|-et}}({{m|-i̯-|-i̯}}){{m|-ī}} | |analysis_morphemic={{m|ad-}}{{m|gon(n)-|gonn}}{{m|-et-|-et}}({{m|-(i)i̯-|-(i)i̯}}){{m|-ī}} | ||
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|a}}{{p|d}}{{p|g}}{{p|o}}{{p|nn}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|ī}}/ | |analysis_phonemic=/{{p|a}}{{p|d}}{{p|g}}{{p|o}}{{p|nn}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}({{p|i}}{{p|i̯}}){{p|ī}}/ | ||
|meaning='(son) of Aśkonet(i)os' | |meaning='(son) of Aśkonet(i)os' | ||
|field_semantic=patronymic | |field_semantic=patronymic | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
Compound personal name in the genitive, with patronymic function in the only attestation ({{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 52, {{bib|Evans 1972}}: 182, {{bib|Lejeune 1990}}: 71). Also attested in Cisalpine Celtic {{w||aśkonetio}} in the nominative, and in Gaulish in the genitive ''adgonneti'' (Narbonnensis), without the derivative suffix {{bib|RIIG}} [https://riig.huma-num.fr/documents/GAR-01-01 GAR-01-01] ({{bib|RIG}} G-156) <span class=" | Compound personal name in the genitive, with patronymic function in the only attestation ({{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 52, {{bib|Evans 1972}}: 182, {{bib|Lejeune 1990}}: 71). Also attested in Cisalpine Celtic {{w||aśkonetio}} in the nominative, and in Gaulish in the genitive ''adgonneti'' (Narbonnensis), without the derivative suffix {{bib|RIIG}} [https://riig.huma-num.fr/documents/GAR-01-01 GAR-01-01] ({{bib|RIG}} G-156) <span class="tr_gr">αδγoννο̣ς̣</span>, {{bib|CIL}} XII 3370 <span class="tr_lat">adgonna</span> (Nîmes) (see {{bib|AcS}} I: 41, {{bib|KGP}}: 113, {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 12, 28, 210). {{w||aśkonetio}} indicates that the underlying form of the genitive attestations is also a ''i̯o''-stem. | ||
While the preverb {{m||ad-}} ({{bib|Stifter 2010}}: 372) and the derivative suffix {{m||-et-}} are clear, the exact semantics of the base {{m||gon(n)-|gonn-}} (see the morpheme page for details) and therefore of the entire name are uncertain. {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 57 f., n. 156 translates 'belonging to the <i>gens</i>' without taking the derivative (agentive?) suffix into account. | While the preverb {{m||ad-}} ({{bib|Stifter 2010}}: 372) and the derivative suffix {{m||-et-}} are clear, the exact semantics of the base {{m||gon(n)-|gonn-}} (see the morpheme page for details) and therefore of the entire name are uncertain. {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 57 f., n. 156 translates 'belonging to the <i>gens</i>' without taking the derivative (agentive?) suffix into account. | ||
An alternative analysis is proposed by {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 151, who assumes that {{m||-et-}} is suffixed to a name like ''asconius'' (cf. Schmidt's explanation of {{m||gon(n)-}} summarised on the morpheme page). | An alternative analysis is proposed by {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 151, who assumes that {{m||-et-}} is suffixed to a name like ''asconius'' (cf. Schmidt's explanation of {{m||gon(n)-}} summarised on the morpheme page). | ||
See also {{bib|Salomon 2024}}: 154. | |||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | <p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 14 September 2024
| Attestation: | TI·41 (alkouinos/aśkoneti) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | Celtic |
| Word Type: | proper noun |
| Semantic Field: | patronymic |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | gen. sg. masc. |
| Stem Class: | o, i̯o |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | ad-gonn-et(-(i)i̯)-ī |
| Phonemic Analysis: | /adgonnet(ii̯)ī/ |
| Meaning: | '(son) of Aśkonet(i)os' |
Commentary
Compound personal name in the genitive, with patronymic function in the only attestation (Lejeune 1971: 52, Evans 1972: 182, Lejeune 1990: 71). Also attested in Cisalpine Celtic aśkonetio in the nominative, and in Gaulish in the genitive adgonneti (Narbonnensis), without the derivative suffix RIIG GAR-01-01 (RIG G-156) αδγoννο̣ς̣, CIL XII 3370 adgonna (Nîmes) (see AcS I: 41, KGP: 113, Delamarre 2007: 12, 28, 210). aśkonetio indicates that the underlying form of the genitive attestations is also a i̯o-stem.
While the preverb ad- (Stifter 2010: 372) and the derivative suffix -et- are clear, the exact semantics of the base gonn- (see the morpheme page for details) and therefore of the entire name are uncertain. Lejeune 1971: 57 f., n. 156 translates 'belonging to the gens' without taking the derivative (agentive?) suffix into account.
An alternative analysis is proposed by Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 151, who assumes that -et- is suffixed to a name like asconius (cf. Schmidt's explanation of gon(n)- summarised on the morpheme page).
See also Salomon 2024: 154.
Bibliography
| AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
|---|---|
| CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
| Delamarre 2007 | Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007. |
| Evans 1972 | D. Ellis Evans, "A comparison of the formation of some Continental and early Insular Celtic personal names", Études Celtiques 13/1 (1972), 171–193. |
