sekezos: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|gender=masc.
|gender=masc.
|language=Celtic
|language=Celtic
|analysis_morphemic={{m|seg-|seg}}{{m|-et-|-et}}{{m|-i̯-|-i̯}}{{m|-os}}
|analysis_morphemic={{m|seg-|seg}}{{m|-et-|-et}}{{m|-(i)i̯-|-(i)i̯}}{{m|-os}}
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|s}}{{p|e}}{{p|g}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|i̯}}{{p|o}}{{p|s}}/
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|s}}{{p|e}}{{p|g}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|i̯}}{{p|o}}{{p|s}}/
|meaning='Sekezos'
|meaning='Sekezos'
Line 13: Line 13:
}}
}}
==Commentary==
==Commentary==
''i̯o''-stem personal name in the nominative. The base is well-attested {{m||seg-}} 'victory'. The suffix could in principle be {{m||-et-}} or {{m||-ed-}}; the former is preferable for several reasons (cf. {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 40). A formation ''seget''- 'victor' is semantically meaningful (cf. {{m||king-|king}}''et''- 'warrior') and attested in the personal name *''segeti̯os'' ({{bib|CIL}} XI 1711 ''segetius'', see {{bib|AcS}} II: 1440 f.) and the theonym ''segetā'' ({{bib|AcS}} II: 1440), while {{m||-ed-}} appears exclusively in ''on''-stems, and ''seged''- is only attested in a Celtiberian placename ''segedā'' (or ''segēdā'', see {{bib|AcS}} II: 1437–1439; but cf. {{bib|Villar & Prósper 2005}}: 285–290 on {{m||-ed-|-ed}}{{m||-i̯-|-i̯o-}} in Celtiberian; also {{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 2009}}: 176, n. 146). Cf. {{w||seχeθu}}, probably with the same base and suffix, but different stem. The presence of a {{m||-i̯-|i̯}}-suffix in ''sekezos'' as in the comparandum ''segetius'' can be inferred from the spelling of the dental with zeta. See the inscription page for the discussion of orthographic aspects.
''i̯o''-stem personal name in the nominative formed from the base {{m||seg-}} 'victory'. The suffix could in principle be {{m||-et-}} or {{m||-ed-}}; the former is preferable for several reasons (cf. {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 40). A formation ''seget''- 'victor' is semantically meaningful (cf. {{m||king-|king}}{{m||-et|-et}}- 'warrior') and attested in the personal name *''segeti̯os'' ({{bib|CIL}} XI 1711 {{tr|lat|segetius}}, see {{bib|AcS}} II: 1440 f.) and the theonym ''segetā'' ({{bib|AcS}} II: 1440), while {{m||-ed-}} appears exclusively in ''on''-stems, and ''seged''- is only attested in a Celtiberian placename ''segedā'' (or ''segēdā'', see {{bib|AcS}} II: 1437–1439; but cf. {{bib|Villar & Prósper 2005}}: 285–290 on {{m||-ed-|-ed}}{{m||-(i)i̯-|-i̯o-}} in Celtiberian; also {{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 2009}}: 176, n. 146). Cf. {{w||seχeθu}}, probably with the same base and suffix, but different stem. The presence of a {{m||-(i)i̯-|i̯}}-suffix in ''sekezos'' as in the comparandum ''segetius'' can be inferred from the spelling of the dental with zeta; this indicates that the form of the suffix in this formation was shortened to /{{p||i̯}}/ to cause palatalisation. See the inscription page for the discussion of orthographic aspects.
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p>
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p>
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 13:43, 8 September 2024

Attestation: CO·57 (sekezos), CO·58 (]ẹḳẹẓos), CO·59 (sekezoṣ), CO·60 (]ezos) (4)
Language: Celtic
Word Type: proper noun
Semantic Field: personal name

Grammatical Categories: nom. sg. masc.
Stem Class: i̯o

Morphemic Analysis: seg-et-(i)i̯-os
Phonemic Analysis: /segetos/
Meaning: 'Sekezos'

Commentary

i̯o-stem personal name in the nominative formed from the base seg- 'victory'. The suffix could in principle be -et- or -ed-; the former is preferable for several reasons (cf. Stifter 2020: 40). A formation seget- 'victor' is semantically meaningful (cf. king-et- 'warrior') and attested in the personal name *segeti̯os (CIL XI 1711 segetius, see AcS II: 1440 f.) and the theonym segetā (AcS II: 1440), while -ed- appears exclusively in on-stems, and seged- is only attested in a Celtiberian placename segedā (or segēdā, see AcS II: 1437–1439; but cf. Villar & Prósper 2005: 285–290 on -ed-i̯o- in Celtiberian; also De Bernardo Stempel 2009: 176, n. 146). Cf. seχeθu, probably with the same base and suffix, but different stem. The presence of a -suffix in sekezos as in the comparandum segetius can be inferred from the spelling of the dental with zeta; this indicates that the form of the suffix in this formation was shortened to // to cause palatalisation. See the inscription page for the discussion of orthographic aspects.

Corinna Salomon

Bibliography

AcS Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907.
CIL Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements)
De Bernardo Stempel 2009 Patrizia de Bernardo Stempel, "La ricostruzione del celtico d'Italia sulla base dell'onomastica antica", in: Paolo Poccetti (ed.), L'onomastica dell'Italia antica. Aspetti linguistici, storici, culturali, tipologici e classificatori, Rome: 2009, 153–192.