kualui: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Patronym in {{m||-al-}} in the dative from an individual name ''kuos''; the exact phonetic form and etymology of the latter are uncertain. | Patronym in {{m||-al-}} in the dative from an individual name ''kuos''; the exact phonetic form and etymology of the latter are uncertain. | ||
To explain ⟨ku⟩ in a ''p''-Celtic language, the name was originally booked as evidence for the preservation of the sequence *''k̑u̯'' in Lepontic (as proposed by {{bib|Kretschmer 1905}}: 126) by Whatmough {{bib|PID}}: 69, who connected it with PIE *''k̑u̯on''- 'dog'. This theory being obsolete, {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232, n. 7 (also {{bib|Eska & Evans 2009}}: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. {{w||kuimpalui}}, {{w||kuaśoni}}) could preserve the labiovelar *''k<sup>u̯</sup>'' before the change to /{{p||p}}/ (considering the late loss of inherited *''p'' as indicated by {{w||uvamokozis}}); this is rejected for ''kualui'' by {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 14 due to the lack of convincing etymologies; a derivation from the 'dog'-word does not work, as a thematisation of the ''on''-stem should be ''k''(''u'')''u̯onos''. As observed by {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 68, a monosyllabic name ''ku̯os'' would not be plausible; the name should be ''kuu̯os'' or ''guu̯os'' (with the sequence ''uu̯'' regularly spelled with single upsilon). Transalpine Gaulish comparanda are sparse to non-existent for both options; {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 139 and {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 199 compare ''cua''(''sus'') (Germania, s. {{bib|AcS}} I: 1180), {{bib|Rix 1995}}: 737 ''couus'' "on Gaulish coins"; {{bib|Sims-Williams 2007}}: 332, n. 118 tentatively compares unlikely ''g<sup>u̯</sup>os'' (Anlaut < PIE *''g<sup>u̯h</sup>'') with W ''gwelw'' 'pale'. The analysis offered by {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 78, who suggests a segmentation {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}{{m||u̯al-|u̯alos}}, cannot be correct, as {{m||-al-}} is certainly the patronymic suffix; cf. however {{w||kuimpalui}} and {{w||kuaśoni}} for analyses of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ with preverb {{m||kom-}} – maybe ''kuu̯os'' is a short name from such a compound with second element in ''u̯''° (cf. {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 14). | To explain ⟨ku⟩ in a ''p''-Celtic language, the name was originally booked as evidence for the preservation of the sequence *''k̑u̯'' in Lepontic (as proposed by {{bib|Kretschmer 1905}}: 126) by Whatmough {{bib|PID}}: 69, who connected it with PIE *''k̑u̯on''- 'dog'. This theory being obsolete, {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232, n. 7 (also {{bib|Eska & Evans 2009}}: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. {{w||kuimpalui}}, {{w||kuaśoni}}) could preserve the labiovelar *''k<sup>u̯</sup>'' before the change to /{{p||p}}/ (considering the late loss of inherited *''p'' as indicated by {{w||uvamokozis}}); this is rejected for ''kualui'' by {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 14 due to the lack of convincing etymologies; a derivation from the 'dog'-word does not work, as a thematisation of the ''on''-stem should be ''k''(''u'')''u̯onos''. As observed by {{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 68, a monosyllabic name ''ku̯os'' would not be plausible; the name should be ''kuu̯os'' or ''guu̯os'' (with the sequence ''uu̯'' regularly spelled with single upsilon). Transalpine Gaulish comparanda are sparse to non-existent for both options; {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 139 and {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 199 compare ''cua''(''sus'') (Germania, s. {{bib|AcS}} I: 1180), {{bib|Rix 1995}}: 737 ''couus'' "on Gaulish coins"; {{bib|Sims-Williams 2007}}: 332, n. 118 tentatively compares unlikely ''g<sup>u̯</sup>os'' (Anlaut < PIE *''g<sup>u̯h</sup>'') with W ''gwelw'' 'pale'. The analysis offered by {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 78, who suggests a segmentation {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}{{m||u̯al-|u̯alos}}, cannot be correct, as {{m||-al-}} is certainly the patronymic suffix; cf. however {{w||kuimpalui}} and {{w||kuaśoni}} for analyses of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ with preverb {{m||kom-}} – maybe ''kuu̯os'' is a short name from such a compound with second element in ''u̯''° (cf. {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 14). See also {{bib|Salomon 2024}}: 151 f. | ||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | <p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 14:10, 29 July 2024
| Attestation: | TI·26 (teromui:kualui) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | prob. Celtic |
| Word Type: | proper noun |
| Semantic Field: | patronymic |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | dat. sg. masc. |
| Stem Class: | o |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | ku-al-ūi̯ |
| Phonemic Analysis: | /kuu̯alūi̯/ (?) |
| Meaning: | 'for the son of Kuos' |
Commentary
Patronym in -al- in the dative from an individual name kuos; the exact phonetic form and etymology of the latter are uncertain.
To explain ⟨ku⟩ in a p-Celtic language, the name was originally booked as evidence for the preservation of the sequence *k̑u̯ in Lepontic (as proposed by Kretschmer 1905: 126) by Whatmough PID: 69, who connected it with PIE *k̑u̯on- 'dog'. This theory being obsolete, Eska 2006: 232, n. 7 (also Eska & Evans 2009: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. kuimpalui, kuaśoni) could preserve the labiovelar *ku̯ before the change to /p/ (considering the late loss of inherited *p as indicated by uvamokozis); this is rejected for kualui by Stifter 2020: 14 due to the lack of convincing etymologies; a derivation from the 'dog'-word does not work, as a thematisation of the on-stem should be k(u)u̯onos. As observed by Lejeune 1971: 68, a monosyllabic name ku̯os would not be plausible; the name should be kuu̯os or guu̯os (with the sequence uu̯ regularly spelled with single upsilon). Transalpine Gaulish comparanda are sparse to non-existent for both options; Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 139 and Motta 2000: 199 compare cua(sus) (Germania, s. AcS I: 1180), Rix 1995: 737 couus "on Gaulish coins"; Sims-Williams 2007: 332, n. 118 tentatively compares unlikely gu̯os (Anlaut < PIE *gu̯h) with W gwelw 'pale'. The analysis offered by Delamarre 2007: 78, who suggests a segmentation ko(m)-u̯alos, cannot be correct, as -al- is certainly the patronymic suffix; cf. however kuimpalui and kuaśoni for analyses of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ with preverb kom- – maybe kuu̯os is a short name from such a compound with second element in u̯° (cf. Stifter 2020: 14). See also Salomon 2024: 151 f.
Bibliography
| AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
|---|---|
| Delamarre 2007 | Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007. |
| Eska & Evans 2009 | Joseph F. Eska, David Ellis Evans, "Continental Celtic", in: Martin J. Ball, Nicole Müller (eds), The Celtic Languages, 2nd edition, London – New York: Routledge 2009, 28–53. |
| Eska 2006 | Joseph F. Eska, "The genitive plural desinence in Celtic and dialect geography", Die Sprache 46/2 (2006), 229–235. |
