sekezos: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|gender=masc. | |gender=masc. | ||
|language=Celtic | |language=Celtic | ||
|analysis_morphemic={{m|seg-|seg}}{{m|-et-|-et}}{{m|-i̯-|-i̯}}{{m|-os}} | |analysis_morphemic={{m|seg-|seg}}{{m|-et-|-et}}{{m|-(i)i̯-|-(i)i̯}}{{m|-os}} | ||
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|s}}{{p|e}}{{p|g}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|i̯}}{{p|o}}{{p|s}}/ | |analysis_phonemic=/{{p|s}}{{p|e}}{{p|g}}{{p|e}}{{p|t}}{{p|i̯}}{{p|o}}{{p|s}}/ | ||
|meaning='Sekezos' | |meaning='Sekezos' | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
''i̯o''-stem personal name in the nominative | ''i̯o''-stem personal name in the nominative formed from the base {{m||seg-}} 'victory'. The suffix could in principle be {{m||-et-}} or {{m||-ed-}}; the former is preferable for several reasons (cf. {{bib|Stifter 2020}}: 40). A formation ''seget''- 'victor' is semantically meaningful (cf. {{m||king-|king}}{{m||-et|-et}}- 'warrior') and attested in the personal name *''segeti̯os'' ({{bib|CIL}} XI 1711 {{tr|lat|segetius}}, see {{bib|AcS}} II: 1440 f.) and the theonym ''segetā'' ({{bib|AcS}} II: 1440), while {{m||-ed-}} appears exclusively in ''on''-stems, and ''seged''- is only attested in a Celtiberian placename ''segedā'' (or ''segēdā'', see {{bib|AcS}} II: 1437–1439; but cf. {{bib|Villar & Prósper 2005}}: 285–290 on {{m||-ed-|-ed}}{{m||-(i)i̯-|-i̯o-}} in Celtiberian; also {{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 2009}}: 176, n. 146). Cf. {{w||seχeθu}}, probably with the same base and suffix, but different stem. The presence of a {{m||-(i)i̯-|i̯}}-suffix in ''sekezos'' as in the comparandum ''segetius'' can be inferred from the spelling of the dental with zeta; this indicates that the form of the suffix in this formation was shortened to /{{p||i̯}}/ to cause palatalisation. See the inscription page for the discussion of orthographic aspects. | ||
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | <p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p> | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Latest revision as of 13:43, 8 September 2024
Attestation: | CO·57 (sekezos), CO·58 (]ẹḳẹẓos), CO·59 (sekezoṣ), CO·60 (]ezos) (4) |
---|---|
Language: | Celtic |
Word Type: | proper noun |
Semantic Field: | personal name |
| |
Grammatical Categories: | nom. sg. masc. |
Stem Class: | i̯o |
| |
Morphemic Analysis: | seg-et-(i)i̯-os |
Phonemic Analysis: | /segeti̯os/ |
Meaning: | 'Sekezos' |
Commentary
i̯o-stem personal name in the nominative formed from the base seg- 'victory'. The suffix could in principle be -et- or -ed-; the former is preferable for several reasons (cf. Stifter 2020: 40). A formation seget- 'victor' is semantically meaningful (cf. king-et- 'warrior') and attested in the personal name *segeti̯os (CIL XI 1711 segetius, see AcS II: 1440 f.) and the theonym segetā (AcS II: 1440), while -ed- appears exclusively in on-stems, and seged- is only attested in a Celtiberian placename segedā (or segēdā, see AcS II: 1437–1439; but cf. Villar & Prósper 2005: 285–290 on -ed-i̯o- in Celtiberian; also De Bernardo Stempel 2009: 176, n. 146). Cf. seχeθu, probably with the same base and suffix, but different stem. The presence of a i̯-suffix in sekezos as in the comparandum segetius can be inferred from the spelling of the dental with zeta; this indicates that the form of the suffix in this formation was shortened to /i̯/ to cause palatalisation. See the inscription page for the discussion of orthographic aspects.
Bibliography
AcS | Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907. |
---|---|
CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
De Bernardo Stempel 2009 | Patrizia de Bernardo Stempel, "La ricostruzione del celtico d'Italia sulla base dell'onomastica antica", in: Paolo Poccetti (ed.), L'onomastica dell'Italia antica. Aspetti linguistici, storici, culturali, tipologici e classificatori, Rome: 2009, 153–192. |