atekua: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|number=sg.
|number=sg.
|case=nom.
|case=nom.
|gender=masc.
|language=Celtic
|language=Lepontic
|analysis_morphemic={{m|ate-}} or {{m|ad-}}{{m|tek-|tek}}{{m|-u-|-u}}{{m|-ā}}
|analysis_morphemic={{m|ateku̯-}}{{m|-ā|ā}} <span style="color:red;">Attention, needs to be checked!</span>
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|a}}{{p|t}}{{p|e}}{{p|k}}{{p|u}}({{p|u̯}}){{p|ā}}/
|analysis_phonemic={{p|a}}{{p|t}}{{p|e}}{{p|k}}{{p|u}}{{p|u̯}}{{p|ā}} <span style="color:red;">Attention, needs to be checked!</span>
|meaning='Atekua'
|meaning="Atekua"
|field_semantic=personal name
|field_semantic=personal name
|checklevel=3
|checklevel=0
|problem=analysis
}}
}}
==Commentary==
==Commentary==
Line 18: Line 16:
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 153
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 153
*{{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 1990}}: 31
*{{bib|De Bernardo Stempel 1990}}: 31
1) ''ate-*kuo-'', ''-kuā'' is probably pronounced /''-ku<sup>u̯</sup>ā''/ and not /''*-k<sup>u̯</sup>ā''/ because of the writing of the same name attested in Latin script in ''-CVA'' instead of ''-QVA''. ({{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 49, 59, fn. 167, 69) 2) This attested form could have preserved pie */kw/ and could be a variant of {{w||atepa}} without the mutation ''k<sup>w</sup>'' > ''p'' (cf. {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 210, {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232 fn. 7).
{{bib|Lejeune 1971}}: 49, 59, fn. 167, 69) 2) This attested form could have preserved pie */kw/ and could be a variant of {{w||atepa}} without the mutation ''k<sup>w</sup>'' > ''p'' (cf. {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 210, {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232 fn. 7).
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 15:29, 10 December 2024

Attestation: VB·27 (aśounị/atekua) (1)
Language: Celtic
Word Type: proper noun
Semantic Field: personal name

Grammatical Categories: nom. sg.
Stem Class: ā

Morphemic Analysis: ate- or ad-tek-u
Phonemic Analysis: /ateku()ā/
Meaning: 'Atekua'

Commentary

The same name is attested in Latin script: see atecua

Lejeune 1971: 49, 59, fn. 167, 69) 2) This attested form could have preserved pie */kw/ and could be a variant of atepa without the mutation kw > p (cf. Motta 2000: 210, Eska 2006: 232 fn. 7).

Bibliography

Delamarre 2007 Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007.
Eska 2006 Joseph F. Eska, "The genitive plural desinence in Celtic and dialect geography", Die Sprache 46/2 (2006), 229–235.