Onomastics: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{bib|Markey & Mees 2003}}: 140, 149, {{bib|Markey 2006}}: 157. | {{bib|Markey & Mees 2003}}: 140, 149, {{bib|Markey 2006}}: 157. | ||
=== Differences between Lepontic and Gaulish personal name formation === | |||
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1965b}}: 568–570 | |||
{{gallery}} | {{gallery}} | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
{{navigation|Overview}} | {{navigation|Overview}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 14 December 2024
Possible binominal name formulae without a clearly recognisable patronym
Second name in -ū?
- VR·19 koliu etu
- NO·28 akluśamoualos leukururitu
- VB·23 kiketu retalos
- VB·2 oletu amaśilu
- CO·48 uvamokozis plialeθu
De Hoz 1990, Lejeune 1990: 77.
Second name in -edū?
Markey & Mees 2003: 140, 149, Markey 2006: 157.
Differences between Lepontic and Gaulish personal name formation
- Tibiletti Bruno 1965b: 568–570
Bibliography
| De Hoz 1990 | Javier de Hoz, "El genitivo celtico de los temas en -o-", in: Francisco Villar (ed.), Studia indogermanica et palaeohispanica in honorem Antonio Tovar et Luis Michelena, Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca 1990, 315–329. |
|---|
