|Reading in transliteration:||]?ume|
|Reading in original script:||?[|
|Object:||BG·1 Bergamo (pot)|
|Direction of writing:||sinistroverse|
|Script:||North Italic script|
|Letter height:||1.7 cm0.669 in <br />|
|Number of letters:||4|
|Number of lines:||1|
|Workmanship:||scratched after firing|
|Archaeological culture:||unknown [from object]|
|Date of inscription:||5th–3rd century BC (?) [from object]|
|Alternative sigla:||Solinas 1995: 33|
Morandi 2004: 211
|Sources:||Morandi 2004: 657 f. no. 211|
First published in Solinas 1995: 333, no. 33.
Images in Solinas 1995: tav. LXV c (photo), Morandi 2004: 656, fig. 24.211 (drawing), Morandi 2007: 290, fig. 282 (photo), Casini & Motta 2018: 119, fig. 2.2 (photo and drawings).
Incised on the shoulder just below the neck; well legible. Upsilon, only damaged at the bottom, mu and epsilon are unambiguous; of the letter before upsilon, only an oblique line in the upper area is left – Morandi (2004 and 2007: 290, no. 1) suggests , but it could as well be kappa , nu or sigma (cf. Casini & Motta 2018: 118, no. 2). The distance between epsilon and the breaking edge is slightly larger than that between upsilon and mu and between mu and epsilon, but it cannot absolutely be excluded that more letters followed.
As observed by Morandi 2004, the shape of mu with three instead of four bars is not that of the Lepontic, but that of the Raetic alphabets. With regard to the position of Bergamo as connecting point between the central Padan plain and the eastern Alpine area, interference from Raetic writing (Sanzeno alphabet) may be considered.
Linguistically, no analysis can be offered. Morandi compares VR·3 and emends to a personal name artume, which is morphologically implausible and unattested. As observed by Casini & Motta 2018: 119 f., e does not make a good Celtic auslaut (outside of a dental suffix) and assume an abbreviation, but as said above the text may be incomplete at the end. In Raetic, e is a common auslaut of masculine personal names; a sequence ]ume[ occurs in VN-2 and VN-3.
Further literature: Poggiani Keller & Brogiolo 1986: 69 (non vidi).
|Casini & Motta 2018||Stefania Casini, Filippo Motta, "Iscrizioni vascolari celtiche a Bergamo", Notizie Archeologiche Bergomensi 26 (2018), 115–128.|