ośoris: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
Compound anthroponym with a second element ''rīg-'' ({{bib|Morandi 1999}}: 176); various analyses and etymologies have been proposed for the first element: *''ordo-rīχs'' ({{bib|Markey 2006}}: 155, n. 6; {{bib|Stifter 2010}}: 372), *''ukso-rīχs-'' ({{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1981}}, cf. {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1989}}: 112-113). It is not clear whether final -⟨s⟩ stands for the cluster [χs], or whether the non-spelling of [χ] indicates that the cluster had already been reduced to a simple sibilant in this position; cf. {{w||toutoris}}.{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 147 suggests *''osso-rīg-io-n'' (cf. Ir. ''Osraige''); cf. maybe Lat. ''Ostorius''? | Compound anthroponym with a second element ''rīg-'' ({{bib|Morandi 1999}}: 176); various analyses and etymologies have been proposed for the first element: *''ordo-rīχs'' ({{bib|Markey 2006}}: 155, n. 6; {{bib|Stifter 2010}}: 372), *''ukso-rīχs-'' ({{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1981}}, cf. {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1989}}: 112-113). It is not clear whether final -⟨s⟩ stands for the cluster [χs], or whether the non-spelling of [χ] indicates that the cluster had already been reduced to a simple sibilant in this position; cf. {{w||toutoris}}, {{w||natoris}}. {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 147 suggests *''osso-rīg-io-n'' (cf. Ir. ''Osraige''); cf. maybe Lat. ''Ostorius''? | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:52, 18 March 2025
| Attestation: | CO·62 (zv ośoris) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | Lepontic |
| Word Type: | proper noun |
| Semantic Field: | personal name |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | nom. sg. masc. |
| Stem Class: | cons. stem |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | oś-o-ri-s |
| Phonemic Analysis: | °orīχs |
| Meaning: | '(Oś)oriχs' |
Commentary
Compound anthroponym with a second element rīg- (Morandi 1999: 176); various analyses and etymologies have been proposed for the first element: *ordo-rīχs (Markey 2006: 155, n. 6; Stifter 2010: 372), *ukso-rīχs- (Tibiletti Bruno 1981, cf. Tibiletti Bruno 1989: 112-113). It is not clear whether final -⟨s⟩ stands for the cluster [χs], or whether the non-spelling of [χ] indicates that the cluster had already been reduced to a simple sibilant in this position; cf. toutoris, natoris. Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 147 suggests *osso-rīg-io-n (cf. Ir. Osraige); cf. maybe Lat. Ostorius?
