kuaśoni: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
}}
}}
==Commentary==
==Commentary==
''on''-stem personal name in the dative. {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232, n. 7 (also {{bib|Eska & Evans 2009}}: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. {{w||kualui}}, {{w||kuimpalui}}), unless they have rare /g<sup>u̯</sup>/ < PIE *''g<sup>u̯h</sup>'', could preserve the labiovelar /{{p||kʷ|k<sup>u̯</sup>}}/ before the change to /{{p||p}}/ (considering the late loss of inherited *''p'' as indicated by {{w||uvamokozis}}), which, however, does not generate any convincing etymologies in the present case. Alternatively, ⟨kua⟩ could reflect preverb {{m||kom-|kom-}}+''u̯a''°- with assimilated /m/ and /o/ (/kuu̯V/- < /kou̯V/- < /komu̯V/ as per {{bib|Stifter 2003}}: 240 f. (cf. {{w||kuimpalui}}), cf. {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 78, who analyses the anlaut of names in ''kuat''° ({{bib|CIL}} XIII 5510 {{tr|lat|cuatasius}} [Dijon], {{tr|lat|cuatilus}} [Heiligenberg]) as {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}''u̯at''- with ''u̯ati''-/-''u''- 'prophet/prophecy'. In this case, ''ku̯aðū'' may be a hypocoristic from a (not otherwise attested) compound {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}{{m||u̯ađ-}} before the assimilation of tau gallicum to /{{p||ss}}/. (The second element can hardly, as in Delamarre's analyses, be ''u̯ati''-/-''u''- with dental suffix, as the element is not attested with tau gallicum in the root auslaut; in fact, /{{p||t}}/ in the Celtic root may itself be the reflex of a dental suffix, see {{bib|Irslinger 2002}}: 98–100.) A comparison with ''cuasus'' with single sigma as suggested by {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 199, {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 534, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: 1019, n. 45 (according to Motta, the reading is not entirely certain, cf. {{bib|Schuermans 1867}}: no. 1788) is uncertain; the analysis as ''cuasso'' from {{w||kualui|kuos}}) plus a suffix -''ass''- as per {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: 1019 f., n. 46, is not feasible. See also {{bib|Salomon 2024}}: 152.
''on''-stem personal name in the dative. {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232, n. 7 (also {{bib|Eska & Evans 2009}}: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. {{w||kualui}}, {{w||kuimpalui}}), unless they have rare /g<sup>u̯</sup>/ < PIE *''g<sup>u̯h</sup>'', could preserve the labiovelar /{{p||kʷ|k<sup>u̯</sup>}}/ before the change to /{{p||p}}/ (considering the late loss of inherited *''p'' as indicated by {{w||uvamokozis}}), which, however, does not generate any convincing etymologies in the present case. Alternatively, ⟨kua⟩ could reflect preverb {{m||kom-|kom-}}+''u̯a''°- with assimilated /m/ and /o/ (/kuu̯V/- < /kou̯V/- < /komu̯V/ as per {{bib|Stifter 2003}}: 240 f. (cf. {{w||kuimpalui}}), cf. {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 78, who analyses the anlaut of names in ''kuat''° (e.g. {{bib|CIL}} XIII 5510 {{tr|lat|cuatasius}}) as {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}''u̯at''- with ''u̯ati''-/-''u''- 'prophet/prophecy'. Pace {{bib|Salomon 2024}}: 152, ''u̯ati''-/-''u''- plus a dental suffix to account for the spelling with san cannot be the second element in ''kuu̯aðū'', as the element is not attested with tau gallicum in auslaut; in fact, /{{p||t}}/ in the Celtic root may itself be the reflex of a dental suffix (see {{bib|Irslinger 2002}}: 98–100). Instead, ''kuu̯aðū'' could be a hypocoristic from a compound *''ko''(''m'')-''u̯asso''- before the assimilation of *''st'' (or intermediate cluster) to /{{p||ss}}/. Cf. {{bib|Prósper & Medano Dunque 2022}}: 22, who suggest *''ko''(''m'')-''ad-sth₂-ó''- 'ready', comparing a potter’s name ''cuasus'' (as in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: 1019, n. 45, {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 199, {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 534) and ''coaso'', with etymological /{{p||o}}/ being pronounced as a high back schwa and variously reflected with omicron or upsilon in writing.
 
See also {{bib|Salomon 2024b}}: 29, n. 16.
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p>
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p>
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 22:57, 7 November 2024

Attestation: TI·27.1 (kuaśoni:pala:telialui) (1)
Language: Celtic
Word Type: proper noun
Semantic Field: personal name

Grammatical Categories: dat. sg. masc.
Stem Class: on

Morphemic Analysis: kom-u̯ađ-oni (?)
Phonemic Analysis: /kua?oni/ (?)
Meaning: 'for Kuaśu'

Commentary

on-stem personal name in the dative. Eska 2006: 232, n. 7 (also Eska & Evans 2009: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. kualui, kuimpalui), unless they have rare /g/ < PIE *gu̯h, could preserve the labiovelar /k/ before the change to /p/ (considering the late loss of inherited *p as indicated by uvamokozis), which, however, does not generate any convincing etymologies in the present case. Alternatively, ⟨kua⟩ could reflect preverb kom-+u̯a°- with assimilated /m/ and /o/ (/kuu̯V/- < /kou̯V/- < /komu̯V/ as per Stifter 2003: 240 f. (cf. kuimpalui), cf. Delamarre 2007: 78, who analyses the anlaut of names in kuat° (e.g. CIL XIII 5510 cuatasius) as ko(m)-u̯at- with u̯ati-/-u- 'prophet/prophecy'. Pace Salomon 2024: 152, u̯ati-/-u- plus a dental suffix to account for the spelling with san cannot be the second element in kuu̯aðū, as the element is not attested with tau gallicum in auslaut; in fact, /t/ in the Celtic root may itself be the reflex of a dental suffix (see Irslinger 2002: 98–100). Instead, kuu̯aðū could be a hypocoristic from a compound *ko(m)-u̯asso- before the assimilation of *st (or intermediate cluster) to /ss/. Cf. Prósper & Medano Dunque 2022: 22, who suggest *ko(m)-ad-sth₂-ó- 'ready', comparing a potter’s name cuasus (as in Tibiletti Bruno 1997: 1019, n. 45, Motta 2000: 199, Morandi 2004: 534) and coaso, with etymological /o/ being pronounced as a high back schwa and variously reflected with omicron or upsilon in writing.

See also Salomon 2024b: 29, n. 16.

Corinna Salomon

Bibliography

CIL Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements)
Delamarre 2007 Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007.
Eska & Evans 2009 Joseph F. Eska, David Ellis Evans, "Continental Celtic", in: Martin J. Ball, Nicole Müller (eds), The Celtic Languages, 2nd edition, London – New York: Routledge 2009, 28–53.
Eska 2006 Joseph F. Eska, "The genitive plural desinence in Celtic and dialect geography", Die Sprache 46/2 (2006), 229–235.