NO·28: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading=akluśamoualos!akluśamo / akluśamoualos!ụalos / leukururitu!leukur / leukururitu!uritu | |reading=akluśamoualos!akluśamo / akluśamoualos!ụalos / leukururitu!leukur / leukururitu!uritu | ||
|reading_lepontic= | |reading_lepontic={{c|A|A2|d}}{{c|K|K5|d}}{{c|L||d}}{{c|U|U12|d}}{{c|Ś||d}}{{c|A|A21|d}}{{c|M|M6|d}}{{c|O|O3|d}}<br>?{{c|A||d}}{{c|L||d}}{{c|O|O3|d}}{{c|S|S6|d}}<br>{{c|L||d}}{{c|E||d}}{{c|U||d}}{{c|K|K5|d}}{{c|U||d}}{{c|R||d}}<br>{{c|U||d}}{{c|R||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|T||d}}{{c|U||d}} | ||
|direction=dextroverse | |direction=dextroverse | ||
|letter_height_min=0 | |letter_height_min=0 | ||
|letter_number_min=24 | |letter_number_min=24 | ||
|word_number= | |word_number=2 | ||
|line_number=4 | |line_number=4 | ||
|corpus=Cisalpine Celtic | |corpus=Cisalpine Celtic | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|position=front, bottom | |position=front, bottom | ||
|workmanship=carved | |workmanship=carved | ||
|condition= | |condition=damaged | ||
|type_inscription=unknown | |type_inscription=unknown | ||
|language=Celtic | |language=Celtic | ||
|meaning= | |meaning='Akluśamoualos Leukururitu' (?) | ||
|source_detail=Gambari 2007: 258 f. | |source_detail=Gambari 2007: 258 f. | ||
|checklevel=3 | |checklevel=3 | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
First published in {{bib|Gambari 2007}}: 258 f. | First published in {{bib|Gambari 2007}}: 258 f. | ||
Images in {{bib|Spagnolo Garzoli 2009}}: 42, fig. 27 (photo), {{bib|Solinas 2022}}: 857, fig. 1b (photo). | |||
Inscribed in irregularly sized letters in four uneven lines in the lower part of the slab; the first two lines are separated from the other two by a horizontal line. Mu appears in a Latinised form {{c||M6|d}} as in [[NO·27]]. Of initial upsilon in the second line, only the angle at the bottom of the line is left due to a break. | |||
{{bib|Gambari 2007}}: 258 f. opts to segment the text into two compound names, each taking up two lines. He interprets the second name as the individual name of the (putative) deceased (''leukuru-ritu''), and the first name as a patronym in {{m||-al-}} (''akluśamou-alos''). This analysis has the advantage of providing a patronym for the expected two-part onomastic formula, even if it is irregularly situated in front of the individual name. However, Gambari's segmentation of {{w||akluśamoualos}} does not explain the use of san instead of sigma and leaves an irregular base (see the word page). We prefer to interpret the sequence as a compound individual name ''akluśamo-u̯alos'', separated at a morpheme border. Similarly, the second compound name can be interpreted in a way that puts the morpheme border at the line break: ''leukur-u̯ritu''. See [[Onomastics]] for a discussion of name groups which (appear to) lack a patronym. | {{bib|Gambari 2007}}: 258 f. opts to segment the text into two compound names, each taking up two lines. He interprets the second name as the individual name of the (putative) deceased (''leukuru-ritu''), and the first name as a patronym in {{m||-al-}} (''akluśamou-alos''). This analysis has the advantage of providing a patronym for the expected two-part onomastic formula, even if it is irregularly situated in front of the individual name. However, Gambari's segmentation of {{w||akluśamoualos}} does not explain the use of san instead of sigma and leaves an irregular base (see the word page). We prefer to interpret the sequence as a compound individual name ''akluśamo-u̯alos'', separated at a morpheme border. Similarly, the second compound name can be interpreted in a way that puts the morpheme border at the line break: ''leukur-u̯ritu''. See [[Onomastics]] for a discussion of name groups which (appear to) lack a patronym. | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 2 March 2023
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Reading in transliteration: | akluśamo / ụalos / leukur / uritu |
| Reading in original script: |         ?       
|
|
| |
| Object: | NO·28 Dormelletto (slab) |
| Position: | front, bottom |
| Direction of writing: | dextroverse |
| Script: | North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet) |
| adapted to: | Latin script |
| Number of letters: | 24 |
| Number of words: | 2 |
| Number of lines: | 4 |
| Workmanship: | carved |
| Condition: | damaged |
|
| |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène C [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | second half of 2nd century BC [from object] |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | Celtic |
| Meaning: | 'Akluśamoualos Leukururitu' (?) |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | none |
|
| |
| Sources: | Gambari 2007: 258 f. |
Images
 Slab NO·28 Dormelletto with inscription NO·28
|
Commentary
First published in Gambari 2007: 258 f.
Images in Spagnolo Garzoli 2009: 42, fig. 27 (photo), Solinas 2022: 857, fig. 1b (photo).
Inscribed in irregularly sized letters in four uneven lines in the lower part of the slab; the first two lines are separated from the other two by a horizontal line. Mu appears in a Latinised form as in NO·27. Of initial upsilon in the second line, only the angle at the bottom of the line is left due to a break.
Gambari 2007: 258 f. opts to segment the text into two compound names, each taking up two lines. He interprets the second name as the individual name of the (putative) deceased (leukuru-ritu), and the first name as a patronym in -al- (akluśamou-alos). This analysis has the advantage of providing a patronym for the expected two-part onomastic formula, even if it is irregularly situated in front of the individual name. However, Gambari's segmentation of akluśamoualos does not explain the use of san instead of sigma and leaves an irregular base (see the word page). We prefer to interpret the sequence as a compound individual name akluśamo-u̯alos, separated at a morpheme border. Similarly, the second compound name can be interpreted in a way that puts the morpheme border at the line break: leukur-u̯ritu. See Onomastics for a discussion of name groups which (appear to) lack a patronym.
If our analysis of akluśamoualos is correct, san denotes the cluster /ts/ in this inscription – see Ś for details.
The function of the inscription is unclear; in the absence of datives an interpretation as a funerary inscription is uncertain. Gambari 2011: 27 f. assumes that the stone was a boundary marker.
Bibliography
| Gambari 2007 | Filippo M. Gambari, "Dormelletto. I documenti epigrafici in celtico cisalpino", Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica del Piemonte 22 (2007), 256–259. |
|---|---|
| Gambari 2011 | Filippo Maria Gambari, "Le pietre dei signori del fiume: il cippo iscritto e le stele del primo periodo della cultura di Golasecca", in: Filippo Maria Gambari, Raffaella Cerri (eds), L'alba della città. Le prime necropoli del centro protourbano di Castelletto Ticino, Novara: 2011, 19–32. |
