VB·27

edit with form

Inscription
Reading in transliteration:	aśounị / atekua
Reading in original script:
Variant reading:	aśoum / atekua
Object:	VB·27 Stresa (stela)
Position:	top, front
Orientation:	0°
Direction of writing:	sinistroverse
Script:	North Italic script (Lepontic alphabet)
adapted to:	Latin script
Letter height:	7–10 cm2.756 in <br />3.937 in <br />
Number of letters:	12
Number of words:	2
Number of lines:	2
Workmanship:	carved
Condition:	complete, damaged
Archaeological culture:	La Tène D 2 [from object]
Date of inscription:	1st c. BC [from object]
Type:	funerary
Language:	Celtic
Meaning:	'Atekua of Aśounos' (?)
Alternative sigla:	Whatmough 1933 (PID): 302 Tibiletti Bruno 1981: 17 Solinas 1995: 126 Morandi 2004: 70
Sources:	Morandi 2004: 567 no. 70

Images

Inscription VB·27 from Morandi 2004

Stela VB·27 Stresa with inscription VB·27

Inscription VB·27

Commentary

First published in Ferrero 1889: 262 (c). Examined for LexLep on 24^th April 2024.

Images in Ferrero 1889: 262 (drawing with incorrect orientation), Ponti 1896: 153, no. 187 (drawing from Fabretti's calque), Ferrero 1897: 59 (drawing from Fabretti's calque = Danielsson 1909: 27), Morandi 2004: 566, fig. 12.70 (drawing), Caramella & De Giuli 1993: 210 (drawing).

Inscribed in two lines in the upper area of the stela (length line 1 48 cm, line 2 27 cm). Despite surface damage, the letters can be cleary identified under raking light, but a number of open questions remain. The reading atekua aśouni 'Atekua (daughter) of Aśounos' goes back to Ferrero 1897: 59, no. 3, who points out that the last group of strokes in the upper line appear to form mu , but prefers ni to get a genitival patronym. Apart from Pauli 1891: 158, who reads aśoum, scholars have stuck with Ferrero's linguistically more plausible reading, but the left-most stroke is very clearly oblique and attached to the previous one; inverted Latin mu of a similar shape also appears in VB·26. Putative nu would have the same shape as in VB·22, viz. Lepontic nu but with hasta and angle of the same height, arguably a compromise between Lepontic and Latin nu.

Equally problematic is the inscription's orientation – an issue which this document shares with two inscriptions of slabs from nearby Brisino (VB·22, VB·23). De-Vit in the original publication inexplicably claims that it is applied vertically, but usually it is read upside-down, with atekua as the first line. The rendering above shows the inscription as seen on the upright stela. An inverted drawing of the inscription is already shown in Ponti 1896 without comment; Ferrero 1897: 59, no. 3 notes that "[l]'iscrizione è incisa capovolta sulla pietra". Again it is Pauli 1891: 158 who accurately reflects the orientation (though with incorrect orientation of alpha in the upper line), but most scholars follow Ferrero. Rhŷs 1913: 51 f., no. 2 suggests that the text was inscribed upside-down because it was more convenient for the stone cutter when the stela lay flat. Whatmough PID 107 f., no. 302 argues that the expected genitival name formula in the right order supports this orientation; he also states that the inscription is in fact upright and applied on the lower end of the stela (cf. Morandi 2004: 567, no. 70 "forse per errore"). See also Danielsson 1909: 26–28, Jacobsohn 1927: 30, no. 190, Pisani 1964: 282 f., no. 119 F, Tibiletti Bruno 1975: 53, Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 153, Tibiletti Bruno 1981: 170 f., no. 17, Solinas 1995: 374, no. 126. Beside the order of the names, the upside-down reading with atekua as the first line is probably also suggested by the orientation of alpha and epsilon, which are letters not commonly inverted. Inverted nu (or mu) also appears in VB·26. If the inscription is read upside-down, only upsilon is inverted (cf. VB·23). Inconsistently inverted letters are notably common on the epichoric Stresa stones, whichever way the inscriptions are turned (see also VB·26). In the case of VB·22 and VB·23, the original position/orientation of the slabs themselves is under debate. Interestingly, this is also the case for the present stela, whose lower part is not, as usual, unfinished, but worked into a rounded shape. Piana Agostinetti 2004: 195 suggests that the stela was not interred, but put up in some kind of support. Alternatively, it may be considered whether the stone, despite its shape, was laid down horizontally to cover the grave. In that case, the inscription would, like, arguably, VB·22 and VB·23, be applied to be legible when standing above it. The argument regarding the order of the names is weak not only because of the uncertain reading of the putative genitival patronym aśouni, but also because the epichoric inscriptions on the Stresa stelae do not exactly distinguish themselves through the regularity of their name formulae (see VB·22, VB·23, VB·26).

The second letter san in the upper line features a vertical stroke through the centre in Morandi's drawing. This letter variant is attested in two other inscriptions (NO·21.1, BG·41.16), but its identification in the present one is uncertain – a corresponding trace can be made out, but may be an irregularity in the surface. As also noted by Morandi, omicron has a somewhat irregular triangular shape.

See also Caramella & De Giuli 1993: 210.

Corinna Salomon

Bibliography

Caramella & De Giuli 1993	Pierangelo Caramella, Alberto De Giuli, Archeologia dell'Alto Novarese, Mergozzo: Antiquarium Mergozzo 1993.
Danielsson 1909	Olof August Danielsson, Zu den venetischen und lepontischen Inschriften [= Skrifter utgivna av Kungliga Humanistiska Vetenskaps-Samfundet i Uppsala 13.1], Uppsala – Leipzig: 1909.
Ferrero 1889	Ermanno Ferrero, "Regione XI. (Transpadana)", Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità (1889), 261–262.
Ferrero 1897	Ermanno Ferrero, "Iscrizioni di Chignolo Verbano", Atti della Società di Archeologia e Belle Arti per la provincia di Torino 7 (1897), 56–60.