kuaśoni: Difference between revisions
From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{word | {{word | ||
|type_word=proper noun | |type_word=proper noun | ||
|stem_class=on | |stem_class=on | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
|case=dat. | |case=dat. | ||
|gender=masc. | |gender=masc. | ||
|language= | |language=Celtic | ||
|analysis_morphemic= | |analysis_morphemic=kuas{{m|-oni}} | ||
|analysis_phonemic= | |analysis_phonemic=/????{{p|o}}{{p|n}}{{p|i}}/ | ||
|meaning='for Kuaśu' | |||
|meaning= | |||
|field_semantic=personal name | |field_semantic=personal name | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
''on''-stem personal name in the dative. {{bib|Eska 2006}}: 232, n. 7 (also {{bib|Eska & Evans 2009}}: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. {{w||kualui}}, {{w||kuimpalui}}), unless they have rare /g<sup>u̯</sup>/ < PIE *''g<sup>u̯h</sup>'', could preserve the labiovelar /{{p||kʷ|k<sup>u̯</sup>}}/ before the change to /{{p||p}}/ (considering the late loss of inherited *''p'' as indicated by {{w||uvamokozis}}), which, however, does not generate any convincing etymologies in the present case. {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}: 78 analyses the anlaut of names in ''kua''° ({{bib|CIL}} XIII 5510 {{tr|lat|cuatasius}} [Dijon], {{tr|lat|cuatilus}} [Heiligenberg]) as {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}''u̯at''- (with ''u̯ati''- 'prophecy'); this could be applied also to ''ku̯aðū''*: hypocoristic from a compound {{m||kom-|ko(m)-}}''u̯at''-''tV''- with dental suffix to form tau gallicum and account for san. A comparison with ''cuasus'' as suggested by {{bib|Motta 2000}}: 199, {{bib|Morandi 2004}}: 534, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: 1019, n. 45 (according to Motta, the reading is not entirely certain, cf. {{bib|Schuermans 1867}}: no. 1788), which equates san and sigma, is not feasible; neither is the analysis as ''cuasso'' from ''kuos'' (cf. {{w||kualui}}) plus a suffix -''ass''- as per {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1997}}: 1019 f., n. 46. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:49, 27 January 2024
| Attestation: | TI·27.1 (kuaśoni:pala:telialui) (1) |
|---|---|
| Language: | Celtic |
| Word Type: | proper noun |
| Semantic Field: | personal name |
|
| |
| Grammatical Categories: | dat. sg. masc. |
| Stem Class: | on |
|
| |
| Morphemic Analysis: | kuas-oni |
| Phonemic Analysis: | /????oni/ |
| Meaning: | 'for Kuaśu' |
Commentary
on-stem personal name in the dative. Eska 2006: 232, n. 7 (also Eska & Evans 2009: 36) suggests that a subset of the names in ⟨kuV⟩ in Cisalpine Celtic (cf. kualui, kuimpalui), unless they have rare /gu̯/ < PIE *gu̯h, could preserve the labiovelar /ku̯/ before the change to /p/ (considering the late loss of inherited *p as indicated by uvamokozis), which, however, does not generate any convincing etymologies in the present case. Delamarre 2007: 78 analyses the anlaut of names in kua° (CIL XIII 5510 cuatasius [Dijon], cuatilus [Heiligenberg]) as ko(m)-u̯at- (with u̯ati- 'prophecy'); this could be applied also to ku̯aðū*: hypocoristic from a compound ko(m)-u̯at-tV- with dental suffix to form tau gallicum and account for san. A comparison with cuasus as suggested by Motta 2000: 199, Morandi 2004: 534, Tibiletti Bruno 1997: 1019, n. 45 (according to Motta, the reading is not entirely certain, cf. Schuermans 1867: no. 1788), which equates san and sigma, is not feasible; neither is the analysis as cuasso from kuos (cf. kualui) plus a suffix -ass- as per Tibiletti Bruno 1997: 1019 f., n. 46.
Bibliography
| CIL | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements) |
|---|---|
| Delamarre 2007 | Xavier Delamarre, Noms de personnes celtiques dans l'épigraphie classique. Nomina Celtica Antiqua Selecta Inscriptionum, Paris: Errance 2007. |
| Eska & Evans 2009 | Joseph F. Eska, David Ellis Evans, "Continental Celtic", in: Martin J. Ball, Nicole Müller (eds), The Celtic Languages, 2nd edition, London – New York: Routledge 2009, 28–53. |
| Eska 2006 | Joseph F. Eska, "The genitive plural desinence in Celtic and dialect geography", Die Sprache 46/2 (2006), 229–235. |
