aterio: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{word
{{word
|citation_form=aterios
|type_word=proper noun
|type_word=proper noun
|stem_class=o, on
|stem_class=o, on
Line 7: Line 6:
|gender=masc.
|gender=masc.
|language=Celtic
|language=Celtic
|analysis_morphemic={{m|ater-}}{{m|-i̯-|i̯-}}[{{m|-os|os}}] or {{m||ater-}}{{m|-i̯o-|i̯-}}{{m|-ū|ū}}
|analysis_morphemic={{m|ater-|ater}}{{m|-i̯-|-i̯}}{{m|-os|-o(s)}} or {{m|ater-|ater}}{{m|--|-i̯}}{{m|-ū}}
|analysis_phonemic={{p|a}}{{p|t}}{{p|e}}{{p|r}}{{p|i}}{{p|o}} or {{p|a}}{{p|t}}{{p|e}}{{p|r}}{{p|i}}{{p|ō}}
|analysis_phonemic=/{{p|a}}{{p|t}}{{p|e}}{{p|r}}{{p|ii̯}}{{p|o}}/ or /{{p|a}}{{p|t}}{{p|e}}{{p|r}}{{p|ii̯}}{{p|ō}}/
|meaning='Aterio'
|meaning='Aterio'
|checklevel=0
|checklevel=1
|problem=Eska n. 8, 9
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Masculine individual name in the nominative. The ending is ambiguous. It may be analysed as a simple ''i̯o''-derivation {{w||ateri̯os}} with loss of final -''s'', cf. Noric {{w||aterius}} in {{bib|Delamarre 2007}}, or as an ''on''-stem derived from a ''i̯o''-stem {{w||ateri̯ū}}, with an individualising suffix, with either -''ū'' > -''ō'' or a Latinised ending -''o''. Though option 1 has better comparanda, option 2 is more likely in light of accompanying {{w||laniakios}} with its auslauting -''s'' intact.
Masculine individual name in the nominative. The stem class should a priori be assumed to be ''o'' ''aterii̯os'' with loss of final -''s'' (see [[The Cisalpine Celtic Languages]]) as attested in Latinised form in {{bib|CIL}} III 12914 {{tr|lat|aterius}} (Raetia). The accompanying patronym {{w||laniakios}}, however, has final -''s'' intact. Unless the loss of -''s'' in the personal name is due to its position within the phrase, we can consider an ''on''-stem ''aterii̯ū'' with either (very badly supported) -''ū'' > -''ō'' or a Latinised ending -''ō'' (though in the latter case, again, a Latinised patronym ''laniakius'' might be expected.


The base is most straightforwardly analysed as {{m||ater-}} < *''φater''- 'father'. Alternatively, we could segment {{m|ate-}}{{m|rii̯o-}} < *''ati-φrii̯o''- (< IE *''priHo''-; W ''rhydd'') 'again free'. However, *''ati''- is only known to be combined with verbs and participles, not primary adjectives. Cf. maybe {{w||ateratos}}.
The base is most straightforwardly analysed as {{m||ater-}} 'father'. An alternative segmentation into preverb {{m||ate-}} + {{m||rii̯-}} 'free' ('free again') (cf. {{w||ateratos}}) is questionable, since {{m||ate-}} is combined with verbs and participles, not primary adjectives.
<p style="text-align:right;>[[User:Corinna Salomon|Corinna Salomon]]</p>
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 14:31, 24 January 2024

Attestation: BG·41.1 (ateriolaniakios) (1)
Language: Celtic
Word Type: proper noun

Grammatical Categories: nom. sg. masc.
Stem Class: o, on

Morphemic Analysis: ater-i̯-o(s) or ater-i̯
Phonemic Analysis: /aterii̯o/ or /aterii̯ō/
Meaning: 'Aterio'

Commentary

Masculine individual name in the nominative. The stem class should a priori be assumed to be o aterii̯os with loss of final -s (see The Cisalpine Celtic Languages) as attested in Latinised form in CIL III 12914 aterius (Raetia). The accompanying patronym laniakios, however, has final -s intact. Unless the loss of -s in the personal name is due to its position within the phrase, we can consider an on-stem aterii̯ū with either (very badly supported) -ū > -ō or a Latinised ending -ō (though in the latter case, again, a Latinised patronym laniakius might be expected.

The base is most straightforwardly analysed as ater- 'father'. An alternative segmentation into preverb ate- + rii̯- 'free' ('free again') (cf. ateratos) is questionable, since ate- is combined with verbs and participles, not primary adjectives.

Corinna Salomon

Bibliography

CIL Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. (17 volumes, various supplements)