NO·18

edit with form

Inscription
Reading in transliteration:	metelui : maeśilalui : uenia : metelikna : aśmina : krasanikna
Reading in original script:
Object:	NO·18 Miasino (bottle)
Position:	shoulder, outside
Orientation:	0°
Direction of writing:	dextroverse
Script:	North Italic script
Number of letters:	47
Number of words:	6
Number of lines:	1
Workmanship:	scratched after firing
Condition:	complete
Archaeological culture:	La Tène D 1 [from object]
Date of inscription:	second half of 2nd century BC [from object]
Type:	unknown
Language:	Celtic
Meaning:	'for Metelos son of Maeśilos Uenia daughter of Metelos (and) Aśmina daughter of Krasanos'
Alternative sigla:	Whatmough 1933 (PID): 321 Tibiletti Bruno 1981: 20 Solinas 1995: 122 Morandi 2004: 94
Sources:	Morandi 2004: 582 no. 94

Images

Bottle NO·18 Miasino with part of inscription NO·18 from Gambari 2019b

Bottle NO·18 Miasino with part of inscription NO·18 from Gambari 2019b

Bottle NO·18 Miasino with inscription NO·18 from Gambari 2019b

Commentary

First published in Lattes 1904. In private possession.

Images in Lattes 1904: 449 (drawings of the letters) and tav. (photos = Rhŷs 1913: tav. VII).

Applied in a circle around the shoulder of the small flask; the last word had to be placed below the first. The reading was already established by Lattes based on the drawing of the letters provided by Curioni, the only point of uncertainty being the first letter of the third word, which looked more like kappa in Curioni's, more like upsilon in Ferrero's drawing; upsilon and everything else are confirmed by Rhŷs 1913: 57 with a description of the letters. Rhŷs 1914: 25 notes that a faint seems to be written under the bars of the first nu in krasanikna and suggests this to be a correction. The alphabet is Lepontic, but mu has a Latin form (cf. VB·1, VB·3.1 at Ornavasso).

The inscription was cited as the main piece of evidence for the ending -ūi̯ being a dative by Danielsson 1909: 18 f. (following a hesitant Herbig 1906: 197, n. 2). uenia metelikna and aśmina krasanikna were taken to be two women, respectively Metelos' daughter and wife, by Lattes, Herbig, Danielsson, Rhŷs and Tibiletti Bruno; Vetter 1926: 12 f. instead proposed that, since the conjunction is missing (cf. -pe in VB·3.1), uenia was a lexeme 'wife', the last four words naming a single person 'wife of Metelos, Aśmina, daughter of Krasanos' (thus also Pisani 1964: 285 f., no. 122). As argued by Lejeune 1971: 73 f., this is syntactically unlikely, as the individual name aśmina should be expected to precede the affiliations, and also implausible with regard to the generally patronymic function of the suffix -ikn-; Lejeune also observed that the relationship of Aśmina to Metelos is not evident. Tibiletti Bruno 1975: 55 f. notes the difference between the patronymic suffixes in the names of Metelos – -al- as on the pala-stelae from the Lugano area – and those of his daughter and putative wife – Gaulish -ikn- –, concluding that the familiy was in the process of Gallicisation.

See also Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 149 f., 165 f.

• Pulgram 1978: 37-38
• Tibiletti Bruno 1981: pp. 174-176, n.20
• McCone 1993
• Meid 1999: p. 15
• Markey & Mees 2003: p. 140

Bibliography

Caramella & De Giuli 1993	Pierangelo Caramella, Alberto De Giuli, Archeologia dell'Alto Novarese, Mergozzo: Antiquarium Mergozzo 1993.
Danielsson 1909	Olof August Danielsson, Zu den venetischen und lepontischen Inschriften [= Skrifter utgivna av Kungliga Humanistiska Vetenskaps-Samfundet i Uppsala 13.1], Uppsala – Leipzig: 1909.
Eska 1995b	Joseph F. Eska, "Another look at Lepontic uenia", Beiträge zur Namenforschung 29/30 (1994/1995), 129–136.
Gambari 2019b	Filippo Maria Gambari, "L'iscrizione vascolare da Carcegna di Miasino e i rapporti tra mercenariato italico e celtico", Quaderni di Archeologia del Piemonte 3 (2019), 93–102.