VC·1.2: Difference between revisions

From Lexicon Leponticum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
|script=North Italic script
|script=North Italic script
|object=VC·1 Vercelli
|object=VC·1 Vercelli
|position=front, lower area
|position=front, bottom
|orientation=0
|orientation=0
|workmanship=unknown
|workmanship=unknown
Line 23: Line 23:
|source_detail=Morandi 2004: 589-590 & 588 (fig. 14.100) & 791 (pl. XIV), Solinas 1995: 381-382, Pisani 1979: 49-53
|source_detail=Morandi 2004: 589-590 & 588 (fig. 14.100) & 791 (pl. XIV), Solinas 1995: 381-382, Pisani 1979: 49-53
|checklevel=3
|checklevel=3
|problem=Buchstabenvarianten (insbes. M), Lesung und Übersetzung: in every lexicon I found the transliteration teuoxtoni(o)n (for exeption Pisani 1979), probably our drawing is a bad/old one. Please check with literature!
|disambiguation=VC·1
|disambiguation=VC·1
}}
}}
==Commentary==
==Commentary==
First published in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1977}}; already mentioned in {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1976}}: 106 f.
Images in {{bib|Lejeune 1988}}: 28, fig. 14 (photo) and 29, fig. 15 (drawing).
Ascribed by Lejeune to the Libicii (as are [[PV·1]] and [[PV·4]]), a Gaulish tribe reported to have settled between Ticino and Po (for the sources s. {{bib|AcS}} II: 204).
Dating Lejeune 25 f.
The scribe wrote ''arkatoko{k}materekos'', which is an obvious dittographical error for {{w||arkatokomaterekos}} (see {{bib|Eska 2000}}: 200 fn. 9).
The scribe wrote ''arkatoko{k}materekos'', which is an obvious dittographical error for {{w||arkatokomaterekos}} (see {{bib|Eska 2000}}: 200 fn. 9).


*{{bib|RIG}}: II-1 pp. 26-37 (inscr. E-2)
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1976}}: 106 f.
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1977}}
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 157 f.
*{{bib|Baldacci 1978}}
*{{bib|Baldacci 1978}}
*{{bib|Bonfante 1979}}: p. 207
*{{bib|Bonfante 1979}}: 207
*{{bib|Meid 1989}}: pp. 7-16
*{{bib|Lejeune 1977}}: 582–610
*{{bib|Uhlich 1999}}: 282 fn. 13, 294
*{{bib|Pisani 1979}}: 49–53
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1976}}: pp. 106-107
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1981}}: 192–196
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1977}}
*{{bib|Marinetti 1982}}: 14 f.
*{{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1981}}: pp. 192-196, n.34
*{{bib|Lejeune 1988}}: 26–37 ({{bib|RIG}} E-2)
*{{bib|Pisani 1979}}: pp. 49-53
*{{bib|Meid 1989}}: 7–16
*{{bib|Prosdocimi 1991}}: pp. 293-300
*{{bib|Lejeune & Briquel 1991}}: n. 296
*{{bib|Lejeune 1977}}: pp. 582-610
*{{bib|Prosdocimi 1991}}: 293-–300
*{{bib|Lejeune & Briquel 1991}}: n.296
*{{bib|Lambert 1994}}: 76–80
*{{bib|Solinas 1995}}: pp. 381-382, n.141
*{{bib|Solinas 1995}}: 381 f., n. 141
*{{bib|Lambert 1994}}: pp. 76-80
*{{bib|Motta 1995}}: 128, 129
*{{bib|Motta 1995}}: pp. 128, 129
*{{bib|Uhlich 1999}}: 282, n. 13, 294
*{{bib|Gambari 2011}}: 28
*{{bib|Gambari 2011}}: 28


{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 21:50, 25 February 2024

Inscription
Reading in transliteration: akisios : arkatokok / materekos : tośo / kote : atom : teuoχ / tom : koneu
Reading in original script: A dK5 dI dS sI dO2 dS sseparator dA dR dK5 dA dT dO2 dK5 dO2 dK5 d
M6 dA dT dE dR dE dK5 dO2 dS sseparator dT dO2 dŚ dO2 d
K5 dO2 dT dE dseparator dA dT dO2 dM6 dseparator dT dE dU dO2 dΧ3 d
T dO2 dM5 dseparator dK dO2 dN dE dU d
Variant reading: teuoχtom (Pisani 1979), teuoχtoni[o]n, atoś (Meid 1989)

Object: VC·1 Vercelli (boundary stone)
(Inscriptions: VC·1.1, VC·1.2)
Position: front, bottom
Orientation:
Direction of writing: dextroverse
Script: North Italic script
Number of letters: 50
Number of words: 6
Number of lines: 4
Workmanship: unknown
Condition: complete, damaged

Archaeological culture: Late Republican [from object]
Date of inscription: shortly before the middle of 1st century BC [from object]

Type: unknown
Language: Cisalpine Gaulish
Syntactic analysis: -
Meaning: -

Alternative sigla: Tibiletti Bruno 1981: 34
Solinas 1995: 141 b
Morandi 2004: 100 9-12

Sources: Morandi 2004: 589-590 & 588 (fig. 14.100) & 791 (pl. XIV)
Solinas 1995: 381-382
Pisani 1979: 49-53

Images

Commentary

First published in Tibiletti Bruno 1977; already mentioned in Tibiletti Bruno 1976: 106 f.

Images in Lejeune 1988: 28, fig. 14 (photo) and 29, fig. 15 (drawing).

Ascribed by Lejeune to the Libicii (as are PV·1 and PV·4), a Gaulish tribe reported to have settled between Ticino and Po (for the sources s. AcS II: 204).

Dating Lejeune 25 f.

The scribe wrote arkatoko{k}materekos, which is an obvious dittographical error for arkatokomaterekos (see Eska 2000: 200 fn. 9).

Bibliography

AcS Alfred Holder, Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Leipzig: Teubner 1896–1907.
Baldacci 1978 Paolo Baldacci, "Una bilingue latino-gallica di Vercelli", Atti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 32 (1977 [1978]), 335–347.
Bonfante 1979 Giuliano Bonfante, "Il Retico, il Leponzio, il Ligure, il Gallico, il Sardo, il Corso", Atti dei Colloqui Lincei ( = Le Iscrizioni Prelatine in Italia; Roma, marzo 1977) 39 (1979).
Gambari 1991 Filippo Maria Gambari, "La stele di Cureggio: una nuova iscrizione epicorica preromana dal Novarese", Sibrium 21 (1990–1991), 227–237.
Gambari 2011 Filippo Maria Gambari, "Le pietre dei signori del fiume: il cippo iscritto e le stele del primo periodo della cultura di Golasecca", in: Filippo Maria Gambari, Raffaella Cerri (eds), L'alba della città. Le prime necropoli del centro protourbano di Castelletto Ticino, Novara: 2011, 19–32.